ArticleJournal of global health2025
Patient and caregiver perceptions of oxygen therapy in facility-based settings for acute hypoxemic conditions: a scoping review.
Article in Journal of global health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Oxygen therapy for children with an oxygen saturation of 90-93% in Malawi: the NoGoLOBMJ paediatrics open · 2026Trial
- Hyperbaric oxygen intervention enhances cooperative gains in high-trust people at high altitude: the role of medial prefrontal interbrain synchrony.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2026Trial
- Reducing global inequities in medical oxygen access: the Lancet Global Health Commission on medical oxygen security.The Lancet. Global health · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Access to oxygen therapy is essential for ensuring a functioning health care system. Despite its widespread application across multiple patient groups and all ages, there is a lack of understanding about community perceptions and experiences while receiving oxygen therapy for acute conditions. We aimed to understand patient and caregiver perceptions of oxygen therapy in facility-based settings for acute hypoxemic conditions. Methods: We conducted a scoping review. We searched Medline, Embase, and Web of Science (26 February 2024) for original studies published since 2000 relating to patient or caregiver perceptions and experiences of oxygen for an acute medical need in health facility settings. We used an adapted theoretical framework of acceptability to extract and structure the findings. Results: Searches returned 10 425 unique records, and 25 articles were included. 20 were from high-income countries, and 18 were qualitative studies. The results showed that patient and caregiver attitudes and feelings about oxygen therapy are strongly influenced by perceived effectiveness, which was almost universally positive. Patients and their caregivers suffer different types of burdens, and these are greater for more advanced respiratory therapies than for simple oxygen therapy. Patient and caregiver understanding of oxygen therapy was low, presenting an opportunity for improved communication. Opportunity costs were highest in caregivers of neonates, who were often separated from their infants for long periods, and out-of-pocket costs were a major consideration in low- and middle-income countries. Conclusions: In this scoping review, we found distinctions in caregiver and patient burden, and their perspectives of oxygen varied between country income. Intervention coherence - the extent to which the patient and their caregivers understand the treatment - was singled out as the key policy area for improvement. Educational campaigns, like those implemented for previous public health emergencies, could lead to increased public knowledge, and thus acceptability, of oxygen therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.