Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40277056›Full record

ReviewCurrent cardiology reviews2025

Critical Challenges in Cancer Immunotherapy and Cardiac Health.

Aftab Alam, Sushma Devi, Sana Hashmi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current cardiology reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Aftab AlamDepartment of Pharmacognosy, College of Pharmacy, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al Kharj 11942, Saudi Arabia.
Sushma DeviChitkara College of Pharmacy, Chitkara University, Rajpura, 140401, Punjab, India.
Sana HashmiDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Unaizah College of Pharmacy, Qassim University, Unaizah 51911, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University PSAU/2025/R/1446
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer immunotherapy is based on immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and has brought a revolution in oncology with promising treatment possibilities for diverse cancers. Yet, immune-related adverse events (irAEs) frequently limit the clinical efficacy of ICIs, with cardiotoxicity representing a significant salient consequence. These ICI side-effects underscore the need for well-established models for the assessment of cardiac risk. This review proposes a risk evaluation strategy that uses biomarkers, non-invasive imaging, and individual patient data. The goal is to elucidate the mechanism through which immune-related adverse events affecting the heart might arise, and the need for predictive tools to better tailor treatment regimens to increase both safety and efficacy. Biomarkers play a vital role in the detection and prevention of heart-related side effects, which means adequate intervention while preserving therapeutic outcomes. Moreover, the study discusses the acknowledgement of novel treatment regimens and the ability of integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) to improve the assessment of risk. AI/ML tools are experts at synthesizing heterogeneous datasets to reveal patterns and risk factors, providing clinicians with powerful capabilities to enhance safety and efficacy. This paper aims to develop sound risk assessment models to enhance both the safety and efficacy of cancer immunotherapies by exploring various strategies and interactions in immunotherapy.

Indexed as

CardiotoxicityHeart DiseasesImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsImmunotherapyNeoplasmsHumansMachine LearningRisk AssessmentImmune Checkpoint Inhibitorsartificial intelligenceCancer immunotherapycardiac monitoring.cardiovascular riskimmune checkpoint inhibitorsimmune-related adverse events

Identifiers

PMID40277056
PMCPMC12676044

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.