ArticleBiomedical chromatography : BMC2025
Investigations Into the Urinary Metabolite Elimination Profile of the Selective Androgen Receptor Modulator S-23 in Studies Mimicking Contaminated Product Ingestion for Doping Control Purposes.
Article in Biomedical chromatography : BMC, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Annual Banned-Substance Review 18th Edition-Analytical Approaches in Human Sports Drug Testing 2024/2025.Drug testing and analysis · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Selective androgen receptor modulators (SARMs) have repeatedly been reason of adverse analytical findings (AAFs) in routine doping controls. Among these, S-23 has been identified in five AAFs reported in 2022. In addition to intentional doping, inadvertent exposure through contaminated dietary supplements has emerged as a significant concern, purportedly as well as evidently contributing to AAFs involving SARMs. Thus, the differentiation of inadvertent intake and intentional abuse of S-23 is of growing relevance. This study aimed at investigating the urinary concentration profile of microdosed S-23 and to characterize the elimination pattern. Single and multidose administration studies with 1, 10, and 50 μg of S-23 were conducted, and collected urine samples were analyzed by LC-MS/MS following enzymatic hydrolysis and solid-phase extraction. The analytical method was validated for a semiquantitative detection of S-23 and characterized by a limit of detection of 1 pg/mL. A total of 18 metabolites was detected in human in vivo samples following oral administration of microdosed S-23. Moreover, the study demonstrated that a single dose of 1 μg can be detected for an average of up to 253 h, while a single dose of 50 μg can be detected up to 544 h on average.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.