SynthesisInternational journal of surgery (London, England)2025
Efficacy and safety of intra-arterial thrombolysis after endovascular reperfusion for acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.
Synthesis in International journal of surgery (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Endovascular thrombectomy versus best medical therapy for acute vertebrobasilar artery occlusion in patients with low NIHSS scores: a meta-analysis.Annals of medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Intra-arterial thrombolysis agents following endovascular thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke: a network meta-analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Pooled it
- Intra-arterial tenecteplase in acute ischemic stroke after successful endovascular thrombectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025Pooled it
- Neurointerventional Advances in 2025.Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Efficacy and safety of tenecteplase versus urokinase in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke.Medicine · 2026Observational
- Intra-Arterial Thrombolysis After Successful Thrombectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis pooled analysis aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intra-arterial thrombolysis (IAT) following near-complete to complete reperfusion by endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) in patients with acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion (AIS-LVO).
methodsWe conducted a search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the adjunct benefit of IAT in patients with AIS-LVO who had achieved a score on the Thrombolysis In Cerebral Infarction (TICI) scale of 2b-3 after EVT. Efficacy outcomes encompassed excellent functional outcome, defined as a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0-1 at 90 days, and functional independence (mRS 0-2). Safety outcomes included symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) and mortality at 90 days. A network meta-analysis (NMA) was performed to evaluate the effects of different types of intra-arterial thrombolytic agents on mRS 0-1.
resultsA total of 7 RCTs were included in the analysis, involving 2128 patients. Relative risks (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were pooled using a random-effects model. The pooled results indicated that adjunctive IAT did not significantly improve the rate of functional independence (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.96-1.13, P = 0.29). However, there was a significant increase in excellent functional outcome with adjunctive IAT (RR 1.23, 95% CI 1.11-1.36, P < 0.001). The pooled analysis did not demonstrate any differences between EVT + IAT and EVT only in rates of sICH (RR 1.23, 95% CI 0.81-1.85, P = 0.33) or 90-day mortality (RR: 0.98, 95% CI: 0.82-1.18; P = 0.86). The NMA found no significant difference in achieving mRS 0-1 among arterial adjunctive alteplase, tenecteplase, and urokinase following successful reperfusion.
conclusionsIAT as an adjunct to successful EVT appears to enhance excellent functional outcome in patients with AIS-LVO without a significant increase in sICH and mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.