ReviewGels (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Survey of Sustainable Wearable Strain Sensors Enabled by Biopolymers and Conductive Organic Polymers.
Review in Gels (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The field of wearable sensors has evolved with operating devices capable of measuring biomechanics and biometrics, and detecting speech. The transduction, being the conversion of the biosignal to a measurable and quantifiable electrical signal, is governed by a conductive organic polymer. Meanwhile, the conformality of skin to the substrate is quintessential. Both the substrate and the conductive polymer must work in concert to reversibly deform with the user's movements for motion tracking. While polydimethylsiloxane shows mechanical compliance as a sensor substrate, it is of environmental interest to replace it with sustainable and degradable alternatives. As both the bulk of the weight and area of the sensor consist of the substrate, using renewable and biodegradable materials for its preparation would be an important step toward improving the lifecycle of wearable sensors. This review highlights wearable resistive sensors that are prepared from naturally occurring polymers that are both sustainable and biodegradable. Conductive polythiophenes are also presented, as well as how they are integrated into the biopolymer for sensors showing mechanical compliance with skin. This polymer is highlighted because of its structural conformality, conductivity, and processability, ensuring it fulfils the requirements for its use in sensors without adversely affecting the overall sustainability and biodegradability of resistive sensors. Different sustainable resistive sensors are also presented, and their performance is compared to conventional sensors to illustrate the successful integration of the biosourced polymers into sensors without comprising the desired elasticity and sensitivity to movement. The current state-of-the-art in sustainable resistive sensors is presented, along with knowledge of how biopolymers from different fields can be leveraged in the rational design of the next generation of sustainable sensors that can potentially be composted after their use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.