ArticleDiseases (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Neoadjuvant Chemohormonal Therapy Versus Pelvic Lymphadenectomy on Biochemical Recurrence in Patients with High- or Very-High-Risk Prostate Cancer Undergoing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy.
Article in Diseases (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Early Identification and Management of Biochemical Recurrence Following Radical Prostatectomy.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesThe effectiveness of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) with extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) in improving oncological outcomes for patients with high- or very-high-risk prostate cancer (HR/VHR-PCa) remains a subject of debate. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy (NCHT) and ePLND in reducing biochemical recurrence (BCR) in patients with HR/VHR-PCa undergoing RARP.
methodsThis retrospective, multicenter cohort study included 1182 patients with HR/VHR-PCa who underwent RARP at six Japanese institutions. Patients were stratified into three groups: those who received NCHT followed by RARP without ePLND (Group 1), those who received neoadjuvant hormonal therapy (NHT) followed by RARP with ePLND (Group 2), and those who underwent RARP with ePLND (Group 3). The primary endpoint was the rate of BCR, while the secondary endpoint was biochemical recurrence-free survival (BRFS) following RARP.
resultsOf the 1182 patients, 154 patients were included in Group 1, 97 patients were included in Group 2, and 470 patients were included in Group 3. By the end of the follow-up period, 243 patients (33.8%) had experienced BCR, 27 (3.7%) had progressed to castration-resistant prostate cancer, and 5 (0.7%) had died from PCa. Over a median follow-up period of 41.4 months, BCR occurred in 16.5% of patients in Group 1, 36.1% of patients in Group 2, and 38.9% in Group 3 (
conclusionsThe findings of this study indicate that NCHT in patients with HR/VHR-PCa undergoing RARP without ePLND may reduce the risk of postoperative BCR compared to those undergoing RARP with ePLND.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.