ReviewJournal of imaging2025
Artificial Intelligence in Placental Pathology: New Diagnostic Imaging Tools in Evolution and in Perspective.
Review in Journal of imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optimizing Ridge Augmentation With AI-Generated Models: A Case Report With Technical Note.Clinical case reports · 2025Article
- Translating Features to Findings: Deep Learning for Melanoma Subtype Prediction.Dermatopathology (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- sFlt-1/PlGF and beyond: angiolymphatic-associated signatures and emerging biomarkers in placental pathology.Vascular biology (Bristol, England) · 2025Review
- Cervical Cytological Findings and Vaginal Microbiota Alterations During Pregnancy: A Retrospective Analysis.Sage open pathologyArticle
- Reimagining Placental Perfusion in Preeclampsia: Integrating Doppler Ultrasound, Three-dimensional Vascular Indices, and Predictive Artificial Intelligence.Journal of medical ultrasoundReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a transformative tool in placental pathology, offering novel diagnostic methods that promise to improve accuracy, reduce inter-observer variability, and positively impact pregnancy outcomes. The primary objective of this review is to summarize recent developments in AI applications tailored specifically to placental histopathology. Current AI-driven approaches include advanced digital image analysis, three-dimensional placental reconstruction, and deep learning models such as GestAltNet for precise gestational age estimation and automated identification of histological lesions, including decidual vasculopathy and maternal vascular malperfusion. Despite these advancements, significant challenges remain, notably dataset heterogeneity, interpretative limitations of current AI algorithms, and issues regarding model transparency. We critically address these limitations by proposing targeted solutions, such as augmenting training datasets with annotated artifacts, promoting explainable AI methods, and enhancing cross-institutional collaborations. Finally, we outline future research directions, emphasizing the refinement of AI algorithms for routine clinical integration and fostering interdisciplinary cooperation among pathologists, computational researchers, and clinical specialists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.