ReviewToxics2025
The Dark Side of "Smart Drugs": Cognitive Enhancement vs. Clinical Concerns.
Review in Toxics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cognitive and Mood Effects of a Soluble Mango Leaf Extract (ZynamitePharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Predictors of Psychoactive and Nootropic Substance Use Among Romanian University Healthcare Students: The Interplay Between Academic Anxiety and Educational Advancement.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Positive AMPA and Kainate Receptor Modulators and Their Therapeutic Potential in CNS Diseases: A Comprehensive Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Unveiling the Potential Role of Cathinone and Cathine Compounds in Alzheimer's Disease: Predictive Insights.Current Alzheimer research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The European Union Drugs Agency has emphasized the increasing difficulty in monitoring the drug market due to the emergence of new psychoactive substances, often marketed as legal highs. The proliferation of fake pharmacies, drugstores, and e-commerce platforms has made access to illicit substances alarmingly rapid and inexpensive. These substances are readily available without medical prescriptions, lacking proper risk assessments or monitoring of potential adverse effects, raising significant public health concerns. Today, the relentless pursuit of validation and success-often, at any cost-has led to an exponential rise in the use of cognitive and mood enhancers. Such substances are frequently consumed to manage demands related to work, diet, sexuality, sleep, achievement, and interpersonal relationships. Consequently, investigating these phenomena is critically important for institutions, as they represent a serious threat to individual development and health. Developing effective preventive and protective systems is essential. This review provides an overview of currently available smart drugs, discussing their desired and adverse neuropharmacological effects, psychological implications, and cognitive decline resulting from their excessive and unregulated use. This review concludes that a multidisciplinary approach combining molecular identification, micro-morphological analysis, and chemical characterization is crucial for the accurate detection, monitoring, and risk mitigation of new psychoactive substances.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.