ArticleJournal of psychiatric research2025
Pretreatment anhedonia as a predictor of exposure-based anxiety treatment outcomes.
Article in Journal of psychiatric research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Functional connectivity during positive mood and anxiety treatment response in children.Journal of affective disorders · 2026Article
- Acupuncture Modulates Neurotransmitter-Related Molecules in the Amygdala to Ameliorate Generalized Anxiety Disorder.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2026Article
- Harnessing Analysis of Individual Differences in Behavior to Identify Novel Mechanisms Relevant to Neuropsychiatric Disorders.Biological psychiatry global open science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Reward processes can reinforce extinction learning and aide cognitive processes involved with inhibitory learning. Anhedonia, characterized by deficits in reward incentivization, hedonic response, and learning, may therefore predict worse treatment outcomes. The current study examined associations between pretreatment self-reported anhedonia and several measures of anxiety symptom severity and treatment outcomes in a naturalistic exposure-based treatment setting. We used multilevel models to examine the relationship between pretreatment anhedonia with change in general treatment response and disorder-specific symptoms for obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD), post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), social anxiety disorder (SAD), and panic disorder (PD). Consistent with hypotheses, pretreatment anhedonia severity was associated with higher pretreatment anxiety symptom severity across all measures. However, inconsistent with hypotheses, higher anhedonia scores were associated with greater symptom improvement across treatment for OCD, GAD, and PD, and had no significant relationships with diagnosis-general outcome measures, PTSD symptoms, or SAD symptoms. In sensitivity analyses including number of sessions, higher anhedonia was associated with more sessions across treatment and anhedonia no longer significantly predicted OCD or GAD treatment outcomes when controlling for treatment dose. Together, findings suggest that individuals with higher pretreatment anhedonia still respond to exposure therapy for anxiety disorders, but may require more sessions. More broadly, results highlight challenges in translating laboratory research to naturalistic clinical settings and the need for intensive longitudinal studies that can assess the role of reward processes in exposure therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.