Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40281073›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Microbiology2025

Epstein-Barr virus pathogenesis and emerging control strategies.

Christian Münz

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. A tonsil organoid model reveals Epstein-Barr virus-infected germinal center B cell states during primary infection.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. EBV Genome Variations and Association With Diseases.Journal of medical virology · 2026
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Christian MünzViral Immunobiology, Institute of Experimental Immunology, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland. christian.muenz@uzh.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6419-1940

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sixty years after its discovery as the first human tumour virus, Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-specific therapies and vaccines have entered clinical trials. These might not only be applicable for EBV-associated malignancies, where the virus was originally discovered, but also to immunopathologies, including the autoimmune disease multiple sclerosis, which might be triggered in susceptible individuals by primary EBV infection. This Review discusses the surprisingly large spectrum of diseases that EBV seems to cause, as well as which of these might be treated by the therapeutic approaches that are currently being developed or are already clinically applied. New pharmacological inhibitors, antibody therapies, adoptive T cell therapies and active vaccinations are beginning to offer possibilities to target the various EBV infection programmes that are associated with different diseases. These novel developments might allow us to specifically target EBV rather than its host cells in virus-associated pathologies.

Indexed as

Epstein-Barr Virus InfectionsAnimalsAntiviral AgentsAutoimmune DiseasesHumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsImmunizationNeoplasmsAntiviral AgentsImmune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.