ArticleScientific reports2025
Survival prediction from imbalanced colorectal cancer dataset using hybrid sampling methods and tree-based classifiers.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Colorectal cancer is a high mortality cancer, with a mortality rate of 64.5% for all stages combined. Clinical data analysis plays a crucial role in predicting the survival of colorectal cancer patients, enabling clinicians to make informed treatment decisions. However, utilizing clinical data can be challenging, especially when dealing with imbalanced outcomes, an aspect often overlooked in this context. This paper focuses on developing algorithms to predict 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival of colorectal cancer patients using clinical datasets, with particular emphasis on the highly imbalanced 1-year survival prediction task. We utilized a colorectal cancer dataset from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, which exhibits high imbalance in the 1-year (1:10) survival analysis and an imbalance in the 3-year (2:10) analysis, achieving balance in the 5-year analysis. The pre-processing step consists of removing records with missing values and merging categories with less than 2% share for each categorical feature to limit the number of classes of each component. Edited Nearest Neighbor, Repeated Edited Nearest Neighbor (RENN), Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique (SMOTE), and pipelines of SMOTE and RENN approaches were used for balancing the data with tree-based classifiers, including Decision Tree, Random Forest, Extra Tree, eXtreme Gradient Boosting, and Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LGBM). The performance evaluation utilizes a 5-fold cross-validation approach. In the case of 1-year, our proposed method with LGBM significantly outperforms other sampling methods with the sensitivity of 72.30%. For the task of 3-year survival, the combination of RENN and LGBM achieves a sensitivity of 80.81%, indicating that our proposed method works best for highly imbalanced datasets. Additionally, when predicting 5-year survival, the sensitivity reaches 63.03% using LGBM. Our proposed method significantly improves mortality prediction for the minority class of colorectal cancer patients. RENN followed by SMOTE yields better sensitivity in the classifiers, with LGBM as the predictor performing best for 1- and 3-year survival. In the 5-year task, LGBM outperforms other models in terms of F1-score.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.