Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40281324›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical psychology in medical settings2025

Intervention Development to Promote Medical Adherence After Stem Cell Transplant.

Donna M Posluszny, Arthur M Nezu, Dana H Bovbjerg, Karen L Syrjala, Mary Amanda Dew

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical psychology in medical settings, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Donna M PoslusznyUniversity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA. poslusznydm@upmc.edu.
Arthur M NezuDrexel University, Philadelphia, USA.
Dana H BovbjergUniversity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA.
Karen L SyrjalaFred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, USA.
Mary Amanda DewUniversity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA.

Funding

Dyadic Intervention to Improve Patient-Family Caregiver Team-Based Management of the Medical Regimen after Allogenetic Hematopoietic Cell TransplantationR01CA268004 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI DONNA M POSLUSZNY · 2022 to 2026
$1.8M
NCI NIH HHS K23CA149082 and P30CA047904NCI NIH HHS R01 CA268004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) can be a lifesaving treatment for patients with hematologic disease. However, adherence to the post-HCT clinical regimen has many challenges that patients and their family caregivers must manage after hospital discharge. To address their needs, we developed a Dyadic Problem-Solving Therapy (DPST) intervention, then examined its feasibility and acceptability to patients and their family caregivers. Twelve patient-family caregiver dyads participated. Four dyads received DPST in person, four received it via online video conferencing. Another four received an enhanced usual care (EUC) intervention of the same length. Feasibility was assessed using completion rates, while acceptability was assessed using satisfaction ratings on the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire. DPST and EUC were both feasible (100% of dyads who started the intervention completed it) and acceptable with satisfaction ratings ranging from 3.6 to 4 for patients and 3.6-3.9 for family caregivers on a 1-4 scale for both DPST groups and ranging from 3.3 to 3.8 for EUC patients and 3.5-4 for EUC family caregivers. There were no evident differences by mode of intervention delivery. DPST, both in person and via video, appears feasible and acceptable for training patient-family caregiver dyads to manage challenges to adherence to the post-HCT regimen.

Indexed as

CaregiversHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationPatient ComplianceProblem SolvingAdultAgedFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionVideoconferencingAllogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantCaregiverDyadProblem-solving therapy

Identifiers

PMID40281324
PMCPMC13095000

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.