Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40281437›Full record

SynthesisBMC gastroenterology2025

Prevalence and patterns of peptic ulcer disease in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Seid Mohammed Abdu, Ebrahim Msaye Assefa, Hussen Abdu

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Seid Mohammed AbduDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Wollo University, Dessie, Ethiopia. seidmd041@gmail.com.
Ebrahim Msaye AssefaDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Wollo University, Dessie, Ethiopia.
Hussen AbduDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Wollo University, Dessie, Ethiopia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeptic ulcer disease (PUD) remains a significant yet poorly understood public health issue in Africa, despite its declining prevalence in Western countries. Studies from Africa report a highly variable burden, with the highest prevalence observed in West Africa and the lowest in Southern Africa. However, the overall burden of PUD in Africa, its patterns (duodenal ulcers, gastric ulcers, and coexisting ulcers), and its association with H. pylori infection remain unclear.

objectiveThis review aims to systematically analyze the pooled prevalence and patterns of PUD in Africa through a systematic review and meta-analysis.

designA systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted following the PRISMA checklist. We searched PubMed, Hinari, and Google Scholar, supplemented by Google and Yahoo search engines. Observational studies reporting the prevalence and patterns of PUD among the African population were included. Two independent reviewers extracted data and assessed study quality. Pooled prevalence estimates were calculated using a random-effects model, with heterogeneity assessed via the Cochrane Q test and I

resultsA comprehensive analysis of 58 studies revealed a pooled prevalence of PUD in Africa at 15.2%. The most common ulcer pattern was DU at 10.2%, followed by GU at 5.8%, while 0.6% of cases had both types. Regional variations were observed, with West Africa having the highest prevalence (19%), followed by East Africa (15%), North Africa (12%), and Southern Africa (8%). Among individual countries, Ghana reported the highest prevalence (27%), followed by Ethiopia (19%) and Tanzania (16%). Furthermore, the pooled prevalence of PUD was 14% before 2010 and 15% in 2011 and later. Additionally, 57.1% of patients tested positive for Helicobacter pylori infection, with its prevalence reaching 76.4% among those diagnosed with PUD. Substantial heterogeneity was observed across most analyses, with I

conclusionThe analysis revealed a significant burden of PUD in Africa, with DU being more common than GU. Regional disparities were observed, with the highest prevalence in West and East Africa. Over the past two decades, the burden has remained relatively stable, reflecting a concerning trend. H. pylori infection was also frequently diagnosed in individuals undergoing endoscopic examination. However, substantial heterogeneity was noted across studies, highlighting variability in reported prevalence.

Indexed as

Peptic UlcerAfricaDuodenal UlcerHelicobacter InfectionsHelicobacter pyloriHumansPrevalenceStomach UlcerAfricaDuodenal ulcerGastric ulcerMeta-analysisPatternPeptic ulcer diseasePrevalenceSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID40281437
PMCPMC12032718

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.