ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2025
Intimate partner violence injuries in Australian orthopaedic clinics: a survey of clinician perspectives.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere is increasing recognition that intimate partner violence (IPV) is a global public health issue (1). In Australia, one in 6 women and one in 17 men experience IPV (2, 3). Musculoskeletal injuries are the second most common pathology suffered due to IPV, and previous studies have reported that as many as 1 in 50 patients present to orthopaedic outpatient clinics as a direct result of IPV (4, 5). Thus, this setting provides a unique opportunity to recognise patients at risk and facilitate intervention.
aimTo investigate the perceptions and experiences of Australian orthopaedic clinicians regarding IPV injuries in outpatient clinics, and to identify barriers that prevent the detection of IPV in this setting.
methodsOrthopaedic surgeons and registrars were surveyed using a secure online platform distributed via the Australian Orthopaedic Association (AOA) from December 2023 to February 2024. Responses were analysed using Chi-square, Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests with a 5% significance threshold.
resultsResponses were provided by 101 fellowship trained surgeons or orthopaedic registrars. 92% either 'agree' or 'strongly agree' that IPV is a significant public health issue. Clinicians treated a mean of 5 patients per year (range 0-30) with reported IPV injuries, accounting for 0.4% (range 0-5.8%) of outpatient clinic presentations. Patients with IPV related injuries presented more frequently to public clinics than private rooms (p = 0.04). The most common perceived barriers to identifying and managing IPV are partners attending with patients (n = 84), time constraints (n = 75), lack of privacy (n = 58), and lack of social supports in clinic (n = 57).
conclusionDespite its prevalence in the wider community, few IPV-related injuries are identified or reported in Australian orthopaedic outpatient clinics, and many barriers exist. Understanding experiences and perceptions of this issue is key to improving our ability to provide care for this vulnerable population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.