ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025
The Role of Chair Design in Dental Ergonomics: A Kinematic Assessment of Movement and Ergonomic Risk.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Art therapy-oriented space design for pediatric dental clinics: a Kano-AHP-FCE framework.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionDental professionals are susceptible to musculoskeletal disorders due to unphysiological postures during treatment, which can be mitigated by the choice of a work chair to improve ergonomic working posture.
methodsIn this study, the influence of five different work chairs on the ergonomic risk assessment using RULA and the working behaviour of 22 right-handed dentists was investigated. To this end, dental treatment was simulated on a phantom head, with the body posture recorded using an inertial motion capture system. The resulting kinematic data were converted into a continuous RULA scheme, and statistical methods (Friedman test with Conover-Iman comparisons and statistical parametric mapping) were used to compare the chairs. The significance level was set at
resultsThe RULA analysis revealed no significant differences between the task chairs that were tested; however, it should be noted that all of the task chairs exhibited an increased ergonomic risk (RULA ≥ 5), which indicates an increased risk of musculoskeletal disorders. Significant multiple comparisons (SPM analysis) between the selected chairs of the relative occurrence of total joint angles were between Chair 1 vs. 5 ( DISCUSSION: The study's findings indicate that the selection of work chairs did not have a significant impact on the ergonomic risk, which remained consistently high across all the chairs. Nevertheless, the analysis of joint angles demonstrated that the Ghopec chair was more frequently associated with greater joint angles, with only a few significant deviations. However, it should be noted that these significant differences in joint angles occurred only sporadically, did not demonstrate a clear and consistent trend across all the chairs, and have no clinical impact. Overall, the results confirm that the working posture of the dentists has a potential risk of developing musculoskeletal disorders, while the ergonomic design of the work chairs plays a rather subordinate role.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.