Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40282079›Full record

ReviewBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Effective for Whom? A Review of Psychological and Social Intervention Recommendations in European Dementia Care Guidelines Through the Lenses of Social Health and Intersectionality.

David Neal, Sara Laureen Bartels, Saloua Berdai Chaouni, Thais Caprioli, Adelina Comas-Herrera, Rabih Chattat, Ana Diaz, Rose-Marie Dröes, Thomas Faulkner, Simone Anna Felding and 19 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Evolving national dementia policies in the OECD: Prevention, diagnosis, and care.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

29 authors.

David NealDepartment of Medical Informatics, Amsterdam UMC, 1100 DD Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7916-3299
Sara Laureen BartelsAlzheimer Centrum Limburg, Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, Mental Health and Neurosciences Research Institute, Faculty of Health Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, 6229 ET Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2626-2557
Saloua Berdai ChaouniSociety and Ageing Research Lab, Department of Adult Educational Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 1050 Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-0455-0144
Thais CaprioliDepartment of Primary Care & Mental Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3GF, UK.
Adelina Comas-HerreraCare Policy and Evaluation Centre, London School of Economics and Political Science, London WC2A 2AE, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9860-9062
Rabih ChattatDepartment of Psychology, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3889-2839
Ana DiazAlzheimer Europe, L-1736 Luxembourg, Luxembourg.
Rose-Marie DröesDepartment of Psychiatry, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, 1081HJ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4812-1229
Thomas FaulknerDepartment of Primary Care & Mental Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3GF, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4969-347X
Simone Anna FeldingGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), 58453 Witten, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0074-5841
Manuel Franco-MartinDepartment of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Hospital Provincial de Zamora, Salamanca University, 49071 Zamora, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3639-2523
Clarissa GiebelDepartment of Primary Care & Mental Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3GF, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0746-0566
Manuel Gonçalves-PereiraNOVA Medical School, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, 1169-056 Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-1419-1306
Samira HesseDepartment of Developmental Psychology, Tilburg University, 5000 LE Tilburg, The Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0008-2647-8295
Iva HolmerovaCentre of Expertise in Longevity and Long-Term Care, Charles University, 18200 Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0003-2375-4174
Wei Qi KohSchool of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, 4072 Brisbane, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8196-1628
Emily MenaInstitute for Public Health and Nursing Research & High-Profile Area of Health Sciences, University of Bremen, 28359 Bremen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4406-8157
Julia MisonowInstitute for Public Health and Nursing Research & High-Profile Area of Health Sciences, University of Bremen, 28359 Bremen, Germany.
Anahit MkrtchyanGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), 58453 Witten, Germany.
Nicole MüllerDepartment of Speech & Hearing Sciences, University College Cork, T12 K8AF Cork, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-4405-5340
Martina RoesGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), 58453 Witten, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4531-8584
Isabeau van RompuyAlzheimer Centrum Limburg, Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, Mental Health and Neurosciences Research Institute, Faculty of Health Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, 6229 ET Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Joanna RymaszewskaDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, 51-377 Wroclaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-8985-3592
Dorota SzcześniakDepartment of Psychiatry, Medical Faculty, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-367 Wroclaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-8899-8842
Jochen René ThyrianGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), 17489 Greifswald, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6889-693X
Marjolein de VugtAlzheimer Centrum Limburg, Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, Mental Health and Neurosciences Research Institute, Faculty of Health Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, 6229 ET Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Amy WaldenSchool of Psychology, Dublin City University, D09 N920 Dublin, Ireland.
Karin Wolf-OstermannInstitute for Public Health and Nursing Research & High-Profile Area of Health Sciences, University of Bremen, 28359 Bremen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8513-3125
Louise HopperSchool of Psychology, Dublin City University, D09 N920 Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-9382-5241

Funding

EU Joint Programme - Neurodegenerative Disease Research (JPND) JPND-WG-2022-1National Institute for Health and Care Research Applied Research Collaboration North West Coast n/a
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In dementia care, access to effective psychosocial interventions is often addressed by evidence-based guidelines for care providers. However, it is unclear if current guidelines consider personal characteristics that may impact intervention effectiveness. This study investigates if, and within what framing, dementia care guidelines in Europe address what is effective and for whom. A review of 47 guidelines from 12 European countries was conducted. Content analysis focused on (i) if guidelines recommended specific psychosocial interventions, and how guidelines referred to (ii) social health, (iii) the intersection of social positioning, and (iv) inequities in care or outcomes. Thirty-five guidelines (74%) recommended specific psychosocial interventions. Around half referenced aspects of social health and of intersectionality. Thirteen guidelines (28%) referenced inequities. Social health was not explicitly recognised as a mechanism of psychosocial interventions. Only age and comorbidity were consistently considered to impact interventions' effectiveness. Inequities were acknowledged to arise from within-country regional variations and individual economic status, but were not linked to (intersectional) individual societal positions such as sex and/or gender, sexuality, and/or religion. The results between European countries were heterogeneous. Current guidelines offer little insight into what works for whom. Policymakers and guideline developers should work with researchers, generating and translating evidence into policy.

Indexed as

dementiadiversityequityguidelineintersectionalityinterventionsocial health

Identifiers

PMID40282079
PMCPMC12023985

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.