ArticleBiology2025
Shared Genomic Features Between Lung Adenocarcinoma and Type 2 Diabetes: A Bioinformatics Study.
Article in Biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) is a common histopathological variant of non-small cell lung cancer. Individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) face an elevated risk of developing LUAD. We examined the common genomic characteristics between LUAD and T2DM through bioinformatics analysis.
methodsWe acquired the GSE40791, GSE25724, GSE10072, and GSE71416 datasets. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified through R software, particularly its version 4.1.3 and analyzed via gene ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment analysis. Subsequently, we analyzed the relationship between immune cell infiltration and DEGs. we constructed a protein-protein interaction network using STRING and visualized it with Cytoscape. Moreover, gene modules were identified utilizing the MCODE plugin, and hub genes were selected through the CytoHubba plugin. Additionally, we evaluated the predictive significance of hub genes using receiver operating characteristic curves and identified the final central hub genes. Finally, we forecasted the regulatory networks of miRNA and transcription factors for the central hub genes.
resultsA total of 748 DEGs were identified. Analysis of immune infiltration showed a notable accumulation of effector-memory CD8 T cells, T follicular helper cells, type 1 T helper cells, activated B cells, natural killer cells, macrophages, and neutrophils in both LUAD and T2DM. Moreover, these DEGs were predominantly enriched in immune-related pathways, including the positive regulation of I-κB kinase/NF-κB signaling, positive regulation of immunoglobulin production, cellular response to interleukin-7, and cellular response to interleukin-4. The TGF-β signaling pathway was significantly important among them. Additionally, seven hub genes were identified, including
conclusionsOur study elucidates the common mechanisms of immune response, TGF-β signaling pathway, and natural killer cells in LUAD and T2DM, and identifies
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.