Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40282525›Full record

ReviewCancers2025

Equity and Opportunities in Lung Cancer Care-Addressing Disparities, Challenges, and Pathways Forward.

Dena G Shehata, Jennifer Megan Pan, Zhuxuan Pan, Janani Vigneswaran, Nicolas Contreras, Emily Rodriguez, Sara Sakowitz, Jessica Magarinos, Sara Pereira, Fatima G Wilder and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Dena G ShehataDivision of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, MA 01805, USA.
Jennifer Megan PanDepartment of General Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Zhuxuan PanUMass Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA 01655, USA.
Janani VigneswaranDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, USA.ORCID 0009-0003-8873-0621
Nicolas ContrerasDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, USA.
Emily RodriguezSchool of Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2398-0729
Sara SakowitzDavid Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA.
Jessica MagarinosDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, USA.
Sara PereiraDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8620-9707
Fatima G WilderDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Ammara A WatkinsDivision of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, MA 01805, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality in the United States, which disproportionately affect racial and ethnic minorities. Disparities in lung cancer screening, diagnosis, treatment, and survival outcomes are due to a complex interplay of socioeconomic factors, structural racism, and limited access to high-quality care. This review aims to examine the underlying causes of these disparities and explore potential mitigation strategies to improve lung cancer care equity.

methodsA review of the literature was conducted, evaluating racial and ethnic disparities in lung cancer care. Disparities in lung cancer screening, genomic testing, surgical and systemic treatment, and survival were explored. Additionally, interventional strategies such as risk-based screening, patient navigation programs, and policy reforms were examined.

resultsRacial and ethnic minority patients are diagnosed at younger ages with fewer pack-years yet are less likely to qualify for screening under current guidelines. They receive lower rates of guideline-concordant treatment, including surgery, radiation, chemotherapy, and biomarker testing, and have reduced access to specialty care. Socioeconomic barriers, medical mistrust, and geographic disparities further contribute to these inequities. Targeted interventions, including mobile screening programs, financial assistance initiatives, and culturally competent care, have shown promise in improving lung cancer outcomes.

conclusionA multi-level approach, incorporating healthcare policy changes, improved screening criteria, and an enhanced community engagement strategy, is essential for achieving equitable lung cancer care, ultimately improving outcomes for racial minority populations.

Indexed as

ethnicitylung cancer disparitieslung cancer screeningracesocial determinants of healthsurgical treatmentsurvival

Identifiers

PMID40282525
PMCPMC12026292

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.