Spinal Drainage and Combined Pharmacotherapy as Potential Strategies to Improve Outcomes for Patients with Poor-Grade Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Treated with Clipping or Coiling but Not Receiving Nimodipine.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Possible Impact of Lymphatic Drainage on Brain Injury After Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
   Review
2. Branch-Critical Clipping of a Ruptured Carotid-Posterior Communicating Aneurysm with Fetal PCA Configuration.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
   Article
3. Potential for multidrug combination therapy in patients with World Federation of Neurological Surgeons grade V subarachnoid hemorrhage.Neurosurgical review · 2025
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as