ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Overview of Research on Digital Image Denoising Methods.
Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Robust Multivariate Thresholding Function for Sparse and Biomedical Signal Reconstruction.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
During image collection, images are often polluted by noise because of imaging conditions and equipment limitations. Images are also disturbed by external noise during compression and transmission, which adversely affects consequent processing, like image segmentation, target recognition, and text detection. A two-dimensional amplitude image is one of the most common image categories, which is widely used in people's daily life and work. Research on this kind of image-denoising algorithm is a hotspot in the field of image denoising. Conventional denoising methods mainly use the nonlocal self-similarity of images and sparser representatives in the converted domain for image denoising. In particular, the three-dimensional block matching filtering (BM3D) algorithm not only effectively removes the image noise but also better retains the detailed information in the image. As artificial intelligence develops, the deep learning-based image-denoising method has become an important research direction. This review provides a general overview and comparison of traditional image-denoising methods and deep neural network-based image-denoising methods. First, the essential framework of classic traditional denoising and deep neural network denoising approaches is presented, and the denoising approaches are classified and summarized. Then, existing denoising methods are compared with quantitative and qualitative analyses on a public denoising dataset. Finally, we point out some potential challenges and directions for future research in the field of image denoising. This review can help researchers clearly understand the differences between various image-denoising algorithms, which not only helps them to choose suitable algorithms or improve and innovate on this basis but also provides research ideas and directions for subsequent research in this field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.