Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40285358›Full record

ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2025

Deep learning in GPCR drug discovery: benchmarking the path to accurate peptide binding.

Luuk R Hoegen Dijkhof, Teemu K E Rönkkö, Hans C von Vegesack, Jacob Lenzing, Alexander S Hauser

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Peptide-based drug design using generative AI.Chemical communications (Cambridge, England) · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Luuk R Hoegen DijkhofDepartment of Drug Design and Pharmacology, University of Copenhagen, Jagtvej 160, 2100 Ø, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Teemu K E RönkköDepartment of Drug Design and Pharmacology, University of Copenhagen, Jagtvej 160, 2100 Ø, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Hans C von VegesackDepartment of Drug Design and Pharmacology, University of Copenhagen, Jagtvej 160, 2100 Ø, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jacob LenzingDepartment of Drug Design and Pharmacology, University of Copenhagen, Jagtvej 160, 2100 Ø, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Alexander S HauserDepartment of Drug Design and Pharmacology, University of Copenhagen, Jagtvej 160, 2100 Ø, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Funding

Carlsberg Foundation CF20-0248
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep learning (DL) methods have drastically advanced structure-based drug discovery by directly predicting protein structures from sequences. Recently, these methods have become increasingly accurate in predicting complexes formed by multiple protein chains. We evaluated these advancements to predict and accurately model the largest receptor family and its cognate peptide hormones. We benchmarked DL tools, including AlphaFold 2.3 (AF2), AlphaFold 3 (AF3), Chai-1, NeuralPLexer, RoseTTAFold-AllAtom, Peptriever, ESMFold, and D-SCRIPT, to predict interactions between G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) and their endogenous peptide ligands. Our results showed that structure-aware models outperformed language models in peptide binding classification, with the top-performing model achieving an area under the curve of 0.86 on a benchmark set of 124 ligands and 1240 decoys. Rescoring predicted structures on local interactions further improved the principal ligand discovery among decoy peptides, whereas DL-based approaches did not. We explored a competitive tournament approach for modeling multiple peptides simultaneously on a single GPCR, which accelerates the performance but reduces true-positive recovery. When evaluating the binding poses of 67 recent complexes, AF2 reproduced the correct binding modes in nearly all cases (94%), surpassing those of both AF3 and Chai-1. Confidence scores correlate with structural binding mode accuracy, which provides a guide for interpreting interface predictions. These results demonstrated that DL models can reliably rediscover peptide binders, aid peptide drug discovery, and guide the selection of optimal tools for GPCR-targeted therapies. To this end, we provided a practical guide for selecting the best models for specific applications and an independent benchmarking set for future model evaluation.

Indexed as

Deep LearningDrug DiscoveryPeptidesReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledBenchmarkingHumansLigandsProtein BindingLigandsPeptidesReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledAlphaFolddockingGPCRpeptide receptorRoseTTAFoldstructure prediction

Identifiers

PMID40285358
PMCPMC12031724

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.