Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40285446›Full record

Trial reportPhysiological reports2025

Cross-education attenuates muscle weakness and facilitates strength recovery after orthopedic immobilization in females: A pilot study.

Joshua C Carr, Caleb C Voskuil, Justin W Andrushko, Rob J MacLennan, Jason M DeFreitas, Matt S Stock, Jonathan P Farthing

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Physiological reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Joshua C CarrDepartment of Kinesiology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0874-0110
Caleb C VoskuilDepartment of Exercise Science, Lakeland University, Plymouth, Wisconsin, USA.
Justin W AndrushkoDepartment of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2258-1689
Rob J MacLennanDepartment of Neurology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Jason M DeFreitasDepartment of Exercise Science, Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York, USA.
Matt S StockUniversity of Central Florida, School of Kinesiology and Rehabilitation Sciences, Orlando, Florida, USA.
Jonathan P FarthingUniversity of Saskatchewan, College of Kinesiology, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.

Funding

Texas Christian University Office of Sponsored Programs 60956
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This pilot study consists of a two-phase intervention to examine the effectiveness of unilateral resistance training to mitigate the negative consequences of immobilization and expedite the restoration of muscle strength and size following a period of retraining. Ten females were randomized to a unilateral training (TRAIN, n = 6) or control (CON, n = 4) group. During Phase 1, all participants wore an arm sling for a total of 4 weeks on their non-dominant arm. This phase required the TRAIN group to perform unilateral resistance training with the non-immobilized arm while the CON group did not. Phase 2 commenced thereafter and consisted of 4 weeks of bilateral resistance training for both groups. Outcome measures of neuromuscular function and muscle size were assessed at baseline and after each phase, with neuromuscular function quantified by maximal dynamic and isometric strength alongside electromyographic responses and muscle size measured using ultrasonography and regional lean mass via DEXA. Unilateral training of the non-immobilized arm during Phase 1 attenuated dynamic (p < 0.05; g > 1.2), but not isometric (p > 0.40; g < 0.095), strength loss following immobilization and showed large effects for improving the recovery of strength after retraining. Similarly, the imaging data show the relative changes in muscle size and regional lean mass of the non-dominant arm favor TRAIN. Although the small sample prevents definitive conclusions, our study suggests resistance training of the non-immobilized arm attenuates muscle weakness and atrophy for the contralateral, immobilized arm during immobilization and facilitates their recovery following retraining.

Indexed as

ImmobilizationMuscle, SkeletalMuscle StrengthMuscle WeaknessResistance TrainingAdultFemaleHumansPilot ProjectsRecovery of FunctionYoung Adultearly medical interventionphysical therapyresistance trainingsports medicine

Identifiers

PMID40285446
PMCPMC12032444

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.