ArticleEpilepsia2025
Changes in cortical delta power during chronic invasive epilepsy monitoring.
Article in Epilepsia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dexmedetomidine produces more sleep-like brain activity compared with propofol in human participants.British journal of anaesthesia · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveCortical delta band (1-4 Hz) activity is considered a biomarker for states of altered consciousness, with increased delta power observed during anesthesia, sleep, coma, and delirium. The current study sought to characterize delta power following electrode implantation with respect to patient demographics and clinical characteristics as well as type and duration of surgery.
methodsParticipants were 25 adult neurosurgical patients implanted with intracranial electrodes for clinical monitoring of their epilepsy. Resting state cortical activity was recorded at multiple occasions over the course of the monitoring period. The initial time point was defined as the first recording within 72 h following surgery. Analyses of cortical activity were conducted using a linear mixed effects modeling approach to account for within-participant correlations and between-participant heterogeneity.
resultsThroughout the monitoring period, delta power decreased in frontal, occipital, parietal, and temporal regions, indicating a global phenomenon. By contrast, beta (14-30 Hz) power remained stable. Delta power was higher following surgical cases that required craniotomy compared to stereoelectroencephalography cases. Surgery duration and anesthesia emergence duration were associated with higher delta power. Recordings from depth electrodes showed higher delta power compared to subdural electrodes. No significant effects of patients' age, sex, white blood cell count, antiseizure medication, and opioid medication dosage on postoperative delta power were found. SIGNIFICANCE: The results are consistent with a postoperative elevation in delta power that resolves over the course of the monitoring period and indicate an association between increased delta power and craniotomy surgery, as well as longer surgery and emergence durations. The current work provides a comprehensive analysis of surgical, clinical, and physiological factors, suggests risk factors, and lays fundamental groundwork for future studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.