ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2025
Longitudinal Evaluation of Metabolic Benefits of Inactivated COVID-19 Vaccination in Diabetic Patients in Tianjin, China.
Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Diabetes significantly heightens risks of COVID-19 infection, and vaccine hesitancy remains high due to safety concerns. MATERIAL AND METHODS This study assessed the effects of inactivated COVID-19 vaccine in 548 diabetic patients from Tianjin, China, categorized by vaccination status: unvaccinated (n=94), primary immunization (n=117), and booster immunization (n=337). A total of 22 clinical values were assessed prior to vaccination, 3 months after vaccination, and 12 months after vaccination. Variables with a normal distribution were compared across groups using one-way ANOVA, while non-normally distributed variables were compared using the Kruskal-Wallis test and chi-square tests for categorical data. Linear mixed-effects models were used to evaluate the effects of time and vaccine type on these clinical values, with random intercepts to account for within-subject variability and interaction terms for detailed group comparisons over time. RESULTS Baseline results showed no major differences across groups, including fasting glucose, HbA1c, granulocytes, hemoglobin, platelets, renal function markers such as uric acid, creatinine, and eGFR. Booster vaccination significantly reduced FPG (Estimate=-0.123, p<0.001) and HbA1c (Estimate=-0.049, p<0.01), with primary vaccination also reducing FPG (Estimate=-0.118, p<0.001) and HbA1c (Estimate=-0.040, p<0.05). However, creatinine decreased and bilirubin levels rose in vaccinated groups but remained within the normal physiological range. Other indicators showed no significant changes. CONCLUSIONS In conclusion, COVID-19 inactivated vaccine can provide metabolic benefits for diabetic patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.