ArticleInsights into imaging2025
Renal ectopic fat deposition and hemodynamics in type 2 diabetes mellitus assessment with magnetic resonance imaging.
Article in Insights into imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multimodal Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Diabetic Kidney Disease: From Pathophysiological Insights to Clinical Applications.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Abnormal lipid metabolism in senescent renal tubular cells in diabetic nephropathy.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo assess renal perfusion and ectopic fat deposition in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), and to evaluate the effects of ectopic fat deposition on renal hemodynamics.
methodsAll participants underwent quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to measure the cortical and medullary renal blood flow (RBF) and proton density fat fraction (PDFF). Patients with T2DM were classified into three groups according to the estimated glomerular filtration rate (mL/min/1.73 m
resultsRenal PDFF values of the renal cortex and medulla, as well as perirenal fat thickness, were significantly different among the four groups: healthy control < T2DM < diabetic kidney disease (DKD) I-II < DKD III-IV. Additionally, significant differences in cortical and medullary RBF values were observed among the four groups: healthy control > T2DM > DKD I-II > DKD III-IV. A significant negative correlation was observed between renal PDFF and RBF values. Medullary RBF values demonstrated the best performance in discriminating T2DM from DKD with the largest area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.971. The cortical PDFF achieved the largest AUC (0.961) for distinguishing DKD I-II from DKD III-IV.
conclusionsQuantitative MRI effectively evaluates renal perfusion and ectopic fat deposition in T2DM patients, aiding in assessing kidney function and disease progression. Additionally, renal ectopic fat deposition may be an important risk factor for renal hemodynamic injury. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Quantitative MRI could serve as a radiation-free imaging modality for assessing renal perfusion and ectopic fat deposition, which may be an important risk factor for DKD progression. KEY POINTS: Quantitative MRI can be used to assess kidney function and monitor disease progression in patients with T2DM. In patients with T2DM, decreased renal perfusion, increased renal ectopic fat deposition, and kidney damage were significantly correlated. Renal ectopic fat deposition may be an important risk factor for renal hemodynamic injury.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.