Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40287947›Full record

ArticleCancer research2025

Blocking Nitrosylation Induces Immunogenic Cell Death by Sensitizing NRAS-Mutant Melanoma to MEK Inhibitors.

Jyoti Srivastava, Vipin K Yadav, Rachel V Jimenez, Pravin R Phadatare, Ninad A Inamdar, Montana M Young, Antonella Bacchiocchi, Ruth Halaban, Bin Fang, Alvaro de Mingo Pulido and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Jyoti Srivastava *Department of Tumor Microenvironment and Metastasis, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida.ORCID 0000-0002-3146-9317
Vipin K Yadav *Department of Tumor Microenvironment and Metastasis, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida.ORCID 0000-0001-9862-5233
Rachel V JimenezDepartment of Immunology, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida.ORCID 0000-0003-2510-2268
Pravin R PhadatareDepartment of Tumor Microenvironment and Metastasis, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida.ORCID 0009-0009-8310-6225
Ninad A InamdarDepartment of Tumor Microenvironment and Metastasis, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida.ORCID 0009-0006-3964-7364
Montana M YoungDepartment of Tumor Microenvironment and Metastasis, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida.ORCID 0009-0009-6379-0752
Antonella BacchiocchiYale Dermatology, Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.ORCID 0009-0007-3016-2528
Ruth HalabanYale Dermatology, Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.ORCID 0000-0001-8451-1964
Bin FangDepartment of Molecular Oncology, and, Proteomics & Metabolomics, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida.ORCID 0000-0002-7636-1318
Alvaro de Mingo PulidoDepartment of Pathology, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida.ORCID 0000-0001-9814-1837
Kenneth Y TsaiDepartment of Pathology, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida.ORCID 0000-0001-5325-212X
Keiran S M SmalleyDepartment of Tumor Microenvironment and Metastasis, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida.ORCID 0000-0003-1089-9307
John M KoomenYale Dermatology, Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.ORCID 0000-0002-3818-1762
Paulo C RodriguezDepartment of Immunology, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida.ORCID 0000-0001-7480-6566
Sanjay PremiDepartment of Tumor Microenvironment and Metastasis, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida.ORCID 0000-0002-5492-5469

Funding

Yale SPORE in Skin CancerP50CA121974 · NCI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI MARCUS W BOSENBERG, Harriet M. Kluger · 2006 to 2026
$43.9M
Plant-derived extracts regulate immunosuppressive myelopoiesis in Breast cancer patientsR01CA262121 · NCI · H. LEE MOFFITT CANCER CTR & RES INST · PI RODRIGUEZ, PAULO CESAR · 2021 to 2025
$2.1M
Mitochondrial stress promotes immunosuppressive potential of myeloid subsets in tumorsR01CA273034 · NCI · H. LEE MOFFITT CANCER CTR & RES INST · PI RODRIGUEZ, PAULO CESAR · 2022 to 2025
$1.9M
Novel role of melanin-carbonyls in progression of NRAS mutant melanomaR21ES035196 · NIEHS · H. LEE MOFFITT CANCER CTR & RES INST · PI PREMI, SANJAY · 2023 to 2023
$463k
Moffitt Cancer Center (MCC) 02-25999-19-13Moffitt Cancer Center (MCC) 09-33661-22-02)Moffitt Cancer Center (MCC) 09-33835-23-02Moffitt Cancer Center (MCC) 30-20458-04-59National Cancer Institute (NCI) R21ES035196NCI NIH HHS P50 CA121974NCI NIH HHS R01 CA262121NCI NIH HHS R01 CA273034NIEHS NIH HHS R21 ES035196
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Activating NRAS mutations occur in 15% to 25% of all melanomas. However, this subtype remains refractory to existing therapeutics, including immunotherapy and RAS inhibitors; therefore, identifying innovative treatment strategies is of utmost importance. We investigated the role of nitrosylation, a nitric oxide-induced posttranslational modification, in melanoma progression and therapeutic resistance. Inhibiting nitrosylation sensitized NRAS-mutant melanomas to targeted MEK inhibitors (MEKi), leading to sustained downregulation of the ERK-MAPK pathway, along with concomitant denitrosylation of NRAS, MEK, ERK, RSK1, and DUSPs. Global nitrosylome profiling using mass spectrometry revealed nitrosylation of multiple ERK regulators. Gain- and loss-of-function studies confirmed a positive association between nitrosylation and ERK activation. ERK and MEK proteins harbored potential nitrosylation sites, mutation of which abrogated their phosphorylation and inhibited cell growth. The nitrosylome also contained damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMP), factors known to induce immunogenic cell death (ICD). Notably, nitrosylation inhibition combined with MEKi markedly inhibited NRAS-mutant melanoma growth in an immunocompetent mouse model. This was accompanied by downregulated MEK-ERK signaling and extracellular release of DAMPs such as calreticulin, phospho-eIF2α, and HMGB1, confirming ICD induction. Furthermore, the combination significantly increased the repertoire of CD8+ T cells, dendritic cells, and macrophages in the tumor microenvironment, which was validated in cocultures of dendritic cells and T lymphocytes. In conclusion, the current study demonstrates that nitrosylation inhibition sensitizes NRAS-mutant melanomas to targeted MEKi-induced cell death and causes the release of non-nitrosylated (active) DAMPs that induce a potent antimelanoma immune response via ICD. These findings highlight potential therapeutic vulnerabilities in the currently untreatable NRAS-mutant melanoma subtype. SIGNIFICANCE: Nitrosylation-regulated molecular mechanisms present a vulnerability that can be exploited to sensitize NRAS-mutant melanomas to existing targeted therapies while enhancing antitumor immunity.

Indexed as

GTP PhosphohydrolasesImmunogenic Cell DeathMelanomaMembrane ProteinsProtein Kinase InhibitorsAnimalsCell Line, TumorHumansMAP Kinase Signaling SystemMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMutationGTP PhosphohydrolasesMembrane ProteinsNRAS protein, humanProtein Kinase Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID40287947
PMCPMC12167936

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.