SynthesisInternational wound journal2025
What is the Impact of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy on Healing in Patients Post Excision of Pilonidal Sinus? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in International wound journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This systematic review aimed to determine the impact of negative pressure wound therapy on healing in patients with pilonidal sinus following surgical excision. Using systematic review methodology, we included original research studies written in English. The search was conducted using CINAHL Plus, Ovid, PubMed, EBSCO Host and Cochrane databases. Quality appraisal was undertaken using the Cochrane Collaboration tool for assessing risk of bias and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). Data were analysed using meta-analysis where appropriate; otherwise, the data are presented narratively. Ten studies were included with a mean sample size of 61 (SD: 33). Three studies were randomised control trials, four were retrospective studies, two were prospective cohort studies and one was pre-post study. Studies showed reduction in healing time, recurrence rates and postoperative pain, as well as higher patients' satisfaction with the use negative pressure wound therapy, however, the certainty of the evidence was very low. The evidence for the intervention is uncertain thus, it is unclear whether NPWT makes any difference when compared to any other dressings, on time to healing, recurrence, pain or patient's experience. Further high-quality research with larger sample sizes is recommended to clearly explore the impact of NPWT on PS healing, recurrence, pain and patient's satisfaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.