Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40289093›Full record

ArticleBMC ophthalmology2025

Association between various dosage forms of semaglutide and ocular adverse events in a real-world setting.

Tao Zhao, Liting Zheng, Yiyun Feng, Min Lao, Yongmei Huang, Guosong Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Semaglutide and risk of Non-Arteritic Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy (NAION) in type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tao Zhao *Baiyun Branch, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510599, China.
Liting Zheng *Baiyun Branch, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510599, China.
Yiyun Feng *Baiyun Branch, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510599, China.
Min LaoBaiyun Branch, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510599, China.
Yongmei HuangBaiyun Branch, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510599, China. 425008225@qq.com.
Guosong WuBaiyun Branch, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510599, China. 13570254292@163.com.

Funding

Guangzhou Baiyun District Dean's Fund Project BYY23011Guangzhou Health Science and Technology Project 20242A011032
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study systematically compares the risk of long-term ocular adverse events between subcutaneous and oral semaglutide preparations to assess pathway-specific safety differences.

methodsIn this study, the Report odds ratio (ROR) technique was employed to detect signals of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) associated with the use of semaglutide. Analysis was conducted on data extracted from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database, covering the period from 2004(Q1) through 2024(Q3). This investigation encompasses a descriptive analysis focused on the administration of semaglutide through various routes, encompassing a broad range of demographics including gender (male and female), age groups, along with other demographic data and the timing of disease onset. Following this, the study employs the ROR methodology to assess the differential adverse event signals across distinct semaglutide formulations.

resultsWe categorized the eye as the System Organ Class (SOC) and obtained 1733 ADE reports related to it from the FAERS database. Of these, 1541 reports were associated with injectables, while tablets were linked to 192 ADE reports. In both dosage forms, most cases occurred within the first month of administration, although the median time to onset (TTO) differed, with injectables identified at 7.00 [IQR 0.00-56.00] days and tablets at only 3.50 [IQR 0.00-35.00] days. It is worth noting that 5.41% of patients administered subcutaneous injections and 2.17% of those receiving oral medications reported ADEs following one year of treatment with semaglutide. Furthermore, female patients exhibited a higher susceptibility to ocular adverse reactions compared to their male counterparts. Regarding the primary preferred terms (PTs), blurred vision constitutes 34.33% of the total ADEs associated with tablet formulations. This incidence is marginally higher than that observed with injectable formulations. This investigation further discerned ocular ADEs signals associated with specific formulations: subcutaneous injections have a higher frequency of reports concerning retinal complications, such as diabetic retinopathy, ischemic optic neuropathy, retinal detachment, retinal tear, and retinal hemorrhage.

conclusionThe results of this study identified a significant difference between subcutaneous and oral semaglutide in ocular ADE risk, providing some evidence for dosage form selection and risk monitoring for clinical use.

Indexed as

Eye DiseasesGlucagon-Like PeptidesHypoglycemic AgentsAdministration, OralAdolescentAdultAdverse Drug Reaction Reporting SystemsAgedAged, 80 and overDatabases, FactualFemaleGlucagon-Like Peptide 1HumansInjections, SubcutaneousMaleMiddle AgedGlucagon-Like Peptide 1Glucagon-Like PeptidesHypoglycemic AgentsSemaglutideDifferent administration routesEye disordersSafety analysisSemaglutide

Identifiers

PMID40289093
PMCPMC12036213

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.