ReviewOrphanet journal of rare diseases2025
Neurofibromatosis-Noonan syndrome: a prospective monocentric study of 26 patients and literature review.
Review in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clinical and Molecular Portraits of Pediatric RASopathies: A Study of 118 Genotype-Confirmed Cases.Clinical genetics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundData on clinical manifestations of neurofibromatosis-Noonan syndrome (NF-NS) remain heterogeneous, with limited validated descriptions.
methodsThis study aims to better define the clinical and molecular features of NF-NS and compare them with existing literature. Secondary objectives include evaluating inter-rater diagnostic agreement among experienced clinicians and assessing the utility of deep-learning algorithms (Face2Gene
resultsTwenty-six patients were enrolled. NSLFP was categorized as 'suggestive' in 69% of cases and 'typical' in 31%. The presence of at least two facial abnormalities (e.g., low-set ears, downslanted palpebral fissures, hypertelorism, and ptosis) was consistently observed in 'typical' cases. Inter-rater concordance was substantial (0.65 [95% CI = 0.56; 0.74]), while concordance between clinicians and F2G was almost perfect at (0.821 [CI 95% = 0.625; 1.000]). Missense NF1 PVs were observed in 38.5% of cases. Apart from NSLP and a high frequency of pectus excavatum (62.5%), no significant differences in anthropometric, dermatological, neurological, skeletal, or ocular clinical features were observed between NF-NS and 'classic' NF1. CHM were found in 19.2% of NF-NS patients, with pulmonic stenosis present in 7.7%.
conclusionNF-NS is a distinct phenotypic variant of NF1, marked by NSLP with consistent facial features -, and frequent pectus excavatum. F2G demonstrated high diagnostic concordance, reinforcing its clinical utility. Given the elevated risk of CHM, especially pulmonic stenosis, proactive cardiovascular assessment similar to other RASopathies is recommended for NS-NF patients, regardless of NF1 PV type.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.