ReviewJournal of Parkinson's disease2026
Preparing for Parkinson's disease prevention trials: Current progress and future directions.
Review in Journal of Parkinson's disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Longitudinal plasma proteomics predict phenoconversion to clinically manifest ALS.Nature medicine · 2026Article
- The road towards faster development of novel pharmacotherapies for persons with Parkinson's disease.Journal of Parkinson's disease · 2026Article
- The North American Prodromal Synucleinopathy study: protocol for a multi-site, longitudinal, observational study of idiopathic/isolated rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder.Sleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society · 2026Article
- Predicting Phenoconversion to Clinically Manifest ALS: Results of a Large-Scale Proteomic Study.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Parkinson's Disease: Bridging Gaps, Building Biomarkers, and Reimagining Clinical Translation.Cells · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In recent decades, numerous clinical trials have aimed to delay or prevent Parkinson's disease (PD) progression. Despite the theoretical promise and encouraging preclinical data, none have shown clear efficacy in slowing or preventing PD progression, related to several key limitations. Conventional motor and non-motor scales often fall short in detecting early disease changes, while the heterogeneity of PD phenotypes complicates treatment efficacy. The timing of interventions is also critical, as most trials target patients already in advanced stages of neurodegeneration. A deeper understanding of the preclinical phase and the emergence of new pathological frameworks have shifted the focus toward preventing the onset of clinical PD. Recent advances in biomarker research, including tissue, fluid, and imaging markers, are poised to transform PD research by improving patient selection, stratification, and disease progression monitoring. New biologically grounded frameworks for classifying synucleinopathies aim to distinguish biological subtypes from clinical phenotypes, enabling more targeted prevention trials. Successful PD prevention trials will require early enrollment of individuals at the highest risk, employing low-risk personalized interventions, with biomarkers or sensitive clinical markers as endpoints. Early involvement of key stakeholders will be essential to ensure that trials are timely, ethically sound, and aligned with the needs of the PD community.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.