Evidence mapPaperPMID 40289934Full record

ReviewNutrients2025

Ketogenic Diets for Body Weight Loss: A Comparison with Other Diets.

Damian Dyńka, Łukasz Rodzeń, Mateusz Rodzeń, Anna Pacholak-Klimas, Georgia Ede, Shebani Sethi, Dorota Łojko, Karolina Bartoń, Ken Berry, Adam Deptuła and 4 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readReviewComparative Study
In one paragraph

Review in Nutrients, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. The Ketogenic Diet in Obesity Management: Friend or Foe?Cell biochemistry and biophysics · 2026
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Fat-rich diet promotes microbiome-dependent ATP synthesis in sheep model.Journal of animal science and biotechnology · 2025
    Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Damian DyńkaInstitute of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Siedlce, 08-110 Siedlce, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-4544-9624
Łukasz RodzeńRodzen Brothers Foundation, 64-234 Wieleń, Poland.
Mateusz RodzeńRodzen Brothers Foundation, 64-234 Wieleń, Poland.
Anna Pacholak-KlimasRodzen Brothers Foundation, 64-234 Wieleń, Poland.
Georgia EdeIndependent Researcher, 197 Lions Mouth Road, Amesbury, MA 01913, USA.
Shebani SethiMetabolic Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA 94305, USA.
Dorota ŁojkoDepartment of Psychiatry, Poznan University of Medical Science, 60-572 Poznan, Poland.
Karolina BartońKarolina Bartoń Food Coach, 00-586 Warsaw, Poland.
Ken BerryIndependent Researcher, Holladay, TN 38341, USA.
Adam DeptułaFaculty of Production Engineering and Logistics, Opole University of Technology, 76 Prószkowska St., 45-758 Opole, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-3017-5998
Żaneta GrzywaczFaculty of Production Engineering and Logistics, Opole University of Technology, 76 Prószkowska St., 45-758 Opole, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-6278-6924
Peter MartinFunmed Clinics, Vastra Hamngatan 13A, 41117 Gothenburg, Sweden.
Jen UnwinThe Collaborative Health Community Foundation, Oxford OX2 9HZ, UK.
David UnwinFaculty of Health Social Care and Medicine, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk L39 4QP, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9950-254X

Funding

Rodzen Brothers Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the prevalence of obesity and overweight increasing at an alarming rate, more and more researchers are focused on identifying effective weight loss strategies. The ketogenic diet (KD), used as a treatment in epilepsy management for over 100 years, is additionally gaining popularity as a weight loss method. Although its efficacy in weight loss is well documented, the areas where it may be beneficial to other dietary approaches need to be carefully examined. The objective of this paper is to identify the potential benefits of the KD over alternative dietary weight loss strategies based on a comprehensive literature review. It has been shown that the KD may be more bioenergetically efficient than other dietary strategies, inter alia owing to its effect on curtailing hunger, improving satiety and decreasing appetite (influence on hunger and satiety hormones and the sensation of hunger), inducing faster initial weight loss (associated with lower glycogen levels and reduced water retention), and controlling glycaemia and insulinemia (directly attributable to the low-carbohydrate nature of KD and indirectly to the other areas described). These effects are accompanied by improved insulin sensitivity, reduced inflammation (through ketone bodies and avoidance of pro-inflammatory sugars), reduced need for pharmacological obesity control (the diet's mechanisms are similar to those of medication but without the side effects), and positive impacts on psychological factors and food addiction. Based on the authors' review of the latest research, it is reasonable to conclude that, due to these many additional health benefits, the KD may be advantageous to other diet-based weight loss strategies. This important hypothesis deserves further exploration, which could be achieved by including outcome measures other than weight loss in future clinical trials, especially when comparing different diets of equal caloric value.

Indexed as

Diet, KetogenicDiet, ReducingObesityWeight LossHumansHungerInsulin Resistanceappetitebody weightglycaemichungerinflammationinsulin resistanceketogenic dietlow carbmetabolic psychiatryobesityweight loss

Identifiers

PMID40289934
PMCPMC11945412

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.