ReviewACS central science2025
Leveraging Prompt Engineering in Large Language Models for Accelerating Chemical Research.
Review in ACS central science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Looking back and to the future after four-plus years of language in chemistry.Digital discovery · 2026Review
- Evaluating Large Language Models for Food Supplement Development: A Case Study in Glycemic Control.Nutrients · 2026Article
- LLM-Assessed Relatedness of Microbiome Study Descriptions Aligns more Strongly with Functional than with Taxonomic Profile Similarity.Microbial ecology · 2026Article
- Synergizing Chemical and AI Communities for Advancing Laboratories of the Future.ACS central science · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) using large language models (LLMs) such as GPTs has revolutionized various fields. Recently, LLMs have also made inroads in chemical research even for users without expertise in coding. However, applying LLMs directly may lead to "hallucinations", where the model generates unreliable or inaccurate information and is further exacerbated by limited data set and inherent complexity of chemical reports. To counteract this, researchers have suggested prompt engineering, which can convey human ideas formatively and unambiguously to LLMs and simultaneously improve LLMs' reasoning capability. So far, prompt engineering remains underutilized in chemistry, with many chemists barely acquainted with its principle and techniques. In this Outlook, we delve into various prompt engineering techniques and illustrate relevant examples for extensive research from metal-organic frameworks and fast-charging batteries to autonomous experiments. We also elucidate the current limitations of prompt engineering with LLMs such as incomplete or biased outcomes and constraints imposed by closed-source limitations. Although LLM-assisted chemical research is still in its early stages, the application of prompt engineering will significantly enhance accuracy and reliability, thereby accelerating chemical research.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.