Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40290317›Full record

ArticleNAR genomics and bioinformatics2025

Evaluating sequence and structural similarity metrics for predicting shared paralog functions.

Olivier Dennler, Colm J Ryan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NAR genomics and bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Paralogs of thebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Olivier DennlerSchool of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin 4, D04 V1W8, Ireland.
Colm J RyanSchool of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin 4, D04 V1W8, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2750-9854

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gene duplication is the primary source of new genes, resulting in most genes having identifiable paralogs. Over time, paralog pairs may diverge in some respects but many retain the ability to perform the same functional role. Protein sequence identity is often used as a proxy for functional similarity and can predict shared functions between paralogs as revealed by synthetic lethal experiments. However, the advent of alternative protein representations, including embeddings from protein language models (PLMs) and predicted structures from AlphaFold, raises the possibility that alternative similarity metrics could better capture functional similarity between paralogs. Here, using two species (budding yeast and human) and two different definitions of shared functionality (shared protein-protein interactions and synthetic lethality), we evaluated a variety of alternative similarity metrics. For some tasks, predicted structural similarity or PLM similarity outperform sequence identity, but more importantly these similarity metrics are not redundant with sequence identity, i.e. combining them with sequence identity leads to improved predictions of shared functionality. By adding contextual features, representing similarity to homologous proteins within and across species, we can significantly enhance our predictions of shared paralog functionality. Overall, our results suggest that alternative similarity metrics capture complementary aspects of functional similarity beyond sequence identity alone.

Indexed as

ProteinsGene DuplicationHumansSaccharomyces cerevisiaeProteins

Identifiers

PMID40290317
PMCPMC12034104

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.