ArticleMethodsX2025
Modified tree-based selection in hierarchical mixed-effect models with trees: A simulation study and real-data application.
Article in MethodsX, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hierarchical mixed-effects models with three trees-3Trees models-are a new advanced statistical learning approach in mixed-effect modeling. These methods utilize the classification and regression trees (CART) algorithm to select the best tree through a backfitting algorithm. However, this algorithm relies on a greedy approach, making the trees prone to overfitting, biased in split selection, and often far from the optimal solution, ultimately affecting model performance. Two novel methods are proposed-3Trees-EvTree and 3Trees-CTree-to address these limitations. The proposed methods are compared with the available methods through several simulation exercises in different settings and real datasets. The simulation study confirms that the 3Trees-EvTree method performs well compared to the previous method in terms of parameter estimation and prediction accuracy under clusMSE and clusPMSE. Meanwhile, the 3Trees-CTree model performs well in low-correlation scenarios and the semilinear function. In addition, the proposed methods also reveal that the results of actual application confirm their superiority over other competing methods. Some highlights of the proposed method are:•3Trees-EvTree and 3Trees-CTree model to improve prediction accuracy and to reduce bias of 3Trees model are presented•MSE, ClusMSE, PMSE, ClusPMSE, and bias criteria are used to evaluate model performance•Applied to estimate and predict household expenditure per capita dataset.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.