Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40292331›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cell and developmental biology2025

Differences in neuronal ciliation rate and ciliary content revealed by systematic imaging-based analysis of hiPSC-derived models across protocols.

Walther Haenseler, Melanie Eschment, Beth Evans, Marta Brasili, Joana Figueiro-Silva, Fee Roethlisberger, Affef Abidi, Darcie Jackson, Martin Müller, Sally A Cowley and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cell and developmental biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Walther HaenselerURPP Adaptive Brain Circuits in Development and Learning, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Melanie EschmentDepartment of Molecular Life Sciences, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Beth EvansDepartment of Molecular Life Sciences, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Marta BrasiliURPP Adaptive Brain Circuits in Development and Learning, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Joana Figueiro-SilvaInstitute of Medical Genetics, University of Zurich, Schlieren, Switzerland.
Fee RoethlisbergerInstitute of Medical Genetics, University of Zurich, Schlieren, Switzerland.
Affef AbidiInstitute of Medical Genetics, University of Zurich, Schlieren, Switzerland.
Darcie JacksonInstitute of Medical Genetics, University of Zurich, Schlieren, Switzerland.
Martin MüllerURPP Adaptive Brain Circuits in Development and Learning, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Sally A CowleyJames and Lillian Martin Centre for Stem Cell Research, Sir William Dunn School of Pathology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Ruxandra Bachmann-GagescuURPP Adaptive Brain Circuits in Development and Learning, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Ciliopathies are a group of human Mendelian disorders caused by dysfunction of primary cilia, small quasi-ubiquitous sensory organelles. Patients suffering from ciliopathies often display prominent neurodevelopmental phenotypes, underscoring the importance of primary cilia during development and for function of the central nervous system (CNS). Human tissues, in particular from the CNS, are very hard to obtain for research. Patient derived- or genetically engineered human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) are therefore a precious resource for investigating the role of cilia in human neurons. Methods: In this study we used a variety of 2D and 3D neuronal differentiation protocols in multiple hiPSC lines and systematically analyzed ciliation rates and ciliary length in hiPSCs, neural stem cells (NSCs), immature and different types of mature neurons using immunofluorescence. Results: We found that ciliation rate varied substantially between cell lines and differentiation protocols. Moreover, ciliation rate depended on differentiation stage, being maximal in NSCs and decreasing with neuronal maturation. In various types of mature neurons obtained with different protocols, we found ciliation rates to be as low as ∼10%. Neuronal density also played an important role, with higher ciliation in denser cultures. We further investigated the ciliary protein content in these cells at different differentiation stages using commonly used antibodies against ARL13B, INPP5E, AC3 and GPR161. Cilia in hiPSCs, NSCs and neurons were all positive for ARL13B, with a decreasing trend in intensity in more mature neurons. Likewise, INPP5E was present in all cilia analyzed, while AC3 positivity increased as maturation proceeded. Interestingly, we found that while GPR161 signal almost completely disappeared from cilia upon Sonic hedgehog (SHH) stimulation in NSCs and immature neurons, this was not the case in more mature neurons, suggesting a possible developmental time window for cilia-dependent SHH signaling. Conclusion: Taken together, our results provide a systematic description of cilia in hiPSC-derived neuronal cells generated with different protocols, underscoring the importance of selecting the optimal model system and controls for investigating primary cilia in hiPSC-derived neuronal cells.

Indexed as

ciliaciliopathieshuman iPSC (induced pluripotent stem cells)immunofluorescence stainingneurons

Identifiers

PMID40292331
PMCPMC12021924

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.