Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40292444›Full record

ArticleNutrients2025

Consecutive Lactation, Infant Birth Weight and Sex Do Not Associate with Milk Production and Infant Milk Intake in Breastfeeding Women.

Ashleigh H Warden, Vanessa S Sakalidis, Jacki L McEachran, Ching Tat Lai, Sharon L Perrella, Donna T Geddes, Zoya Gridneva

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ashleigh H WardenSchool of Molecular Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia.
Vanessa S SakalidisMenzies School of Health Research, Royal Darwin Hospital Campus, Casuarina, NT 0810, Australia.
Jacki L McEachranSchool of Molecular Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6648-1316
Ching Tat LaiSchool of Molecular Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9025-4922
Sharon L PerrellaSchool of Molecular Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7727-7767
Donna T GeddesSchool of Molecular Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia.
Zoya GridnevaSchool of Molecular Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6841-2958

Funding

Medela AG, Switzerland Unrestricted research grant
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectivesOptimal infant growth is reliant on the sufficient intake of human milk. Studies in animal models speculate that multiparous mothers produce a higher milk yield compared to primiparous mothers. We aimed to examine if there are relationships between consecutive lactations and infant demographics and both maternal 24 h milk production (MP) and infant milk intake (MI).

methodsLactating mothers 1-6 months postpartum (

resultsIn the FBF group, there were no differences between lactations in terms of MP (

conclusionsThis study suggests that in fully breastfeeding women, there is no significant effect of consecutive lactation or infant sex on MP or infant MI during established lactation.

Indexed as

Birth WeightBreast FeedingLactationMilk, HumanAdultFemaleHumansInfantInfant FormulaInfant, NewbornInfant Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaMaleSex Factorsbirth weightbreastfeedingcommercial milk formulaconsecutive lactationearly nutritionhuman milkinfant sexmilk intakemilk production

Identifiers

PMID40292444
PMCPMC11945202

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.