Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40293277›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgery2025

Frailty and Survival for Diagnoses Feasibly Managed Operatively or Nonoperatively.

Emily Mosher, Hasan Nassereldine, Jeffrey C McKibben, Jason Johanning, Shipra Arya, Nader N Massarweh, Rupen Shah, Myrick Shinall, Paula Shireman, Patrick R Varley and 17 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors.

Emily MosherDivision of Vascular Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Hasan NassereldineDepartment of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.ORCID 0000-0003-2298-3098
Jeffrey C McKibbenDepartment of Clinical Analytics, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Health Services Division, Pittsburgh, PA.
Jason JohanningDepartment of SurgeryUniversity of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE.
Shipra AryaDivision of Vascular Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA.
Nader N MassarwehSurgical and Perioperative Care, Atlanta Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Decatur, GA.
Rupen ShahDepartment of Surgery, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI.
Myrick ShinallDepartment of Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
Paula ShiremanDepartments of Medical Physiology and Primary Care & Rural Medicine, College of Medicine, Texas A&M University, Bryan, TX.
Patrick R VarleyDepartment of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Madison, WI.
Elizabeth L GeorgeDivision of Vascular Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA.
Ada YoukCenter for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Veterans Affairs Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA.
Leah BackhusDepartment of Veterans Affairs, Palo Alto Health Care System, Cardiothoracic Surgery Division, USA.
Alaina J BrownDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
Neil ChristieDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Rajeev DhuparDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Nicole DonnellanDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Nicholas John GioriDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
Matthew R GoedeDepartment of SurgeryUniversity of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE.
Richard GuidoDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Joon LeeDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA.
Jennifer L Griffin MillerOlson Center for Women's Health, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE.
Justin C SieblerDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE.
Daniel A TonettiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Cooper University Health Care, Camden, NJ.
Scott A VincentDepartment of Surgery, Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.
Katherine M ReitzDivision of Vascular Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Daniel E HallDepartment of Surgery, Veterans Affairs Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA.ORCID 0000-0001-6382-0522

Funding

University of Pittsburgh Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR001857 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI REIS, STEVEN E · 2016 to 2025
$129.3M
Vascular Surgery Research Training (VascTrain) ProgramT32HL098036 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Edith Tzeng · 2010 to 2026
$7.2M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001857NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL098036NIA NIH HHS L30 AG064730
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveCompare outcomes, stratified by frailty, of patients with eight common conditions with plausible operative and nonoperative management strategies. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: A surgical pause, evaluating potential adverse outcomes among frail patients, improves postoperative outcomes; however, the outcomes among patients opting for nonoperative management are unknown.

methodsIn an observational cohort study across a multi-hospital healthcare system including adults presenting to outpatient surgical clinics (2016-2023) for evaluation of eight conditions feasibly managed operatively or nonoperatively as defined by modified Delphi consensus. In a landmarked analysis, we compared 2-year survival by management strategies across frailty categories (robust, normal, frail, very frail) as defined by the Risk Analysis Index (RAI). Secondarily we compared 365-day hospital free days (HFD-365), postoperative length of stay, and discharge disposition.

resultsAmong 49,169 patients (mean±SD age, 60.4±14.6 y; 54.6% female), operative management was associated with lower observed and adjusted mortality (1.3% vs 2.5%; aHR=0.55 [95% CI, 0.47-0.66], P<0.0001) overall and among all frailty categories expect the very frail (8.1% vs 12.1%, P=0.1). Additionally, operative management was associated with fewer HFD-365 again overall which was specifically prominent among the very frail (median 365 [IQR, 358-365] vs 361 days [IQR, 357-363], P<0.0001). Postoperatively, frailty portended more protracted recoveries with greater postoperative lengths of stay (1.7±2.6 vs 1.2±2.1) days, P<0.0001) and fewer discharges home (370 [85.1%] vs 5,087 [91.8%], P<0.0001; odds ratio=2.0 [95%CI 1.5-2.6]).

conclusionsConsidering the protracted postoperative recovery of very frail patients, nonoperative management might be the preferred treatment option for those presenting with these eight clinical conditions.

Indexed as

electivefrailtymanagement

Identifiers

PMID40293277
PMCPMC13082680

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.