Trial reportRheumatology international2025
RhePort 1.3 enhances early identification of inflammatory rheumatic diseases: a prospective study in German rheumatology settings.
Trial report in Rheumatology international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- When does laboratory completeness become a quality indicator in early arthritis referral?Rheumatology international · 2026Article
- Machine learning improves online self-referral for inflammatory rheumatic diseases: a registry-based validation study.Rheumatology international · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
More efficient means of identifying patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases (IRDs) could allow earlier diagnosis and treatment. The objective of this study was to evaluate the characteristics of a revised version of an online patient questionnaire-based self-referral tool, RhePort 1.3. This prospective study included adult patients with musculoskeletal complaints presenting for a first rheumatology visit at German RheumaDatenRhePort (RHADAR) rheumatology network centers. All patients completed the RhePort 1.3 questionnaire on patient characteristics and symptoms. Data from RhePort 1.3 were compared with historical data from previous versions. Of 614 patients, 225 (36.6%) were diagnosed with an IRD by a rheumatologist and 164/225 IRD patients (72.9%) had a RhePort 1.3 score > 1, the cut-off point used to determine the need for rheumatologic evaluation. A score > 1 was associated with an approximately two-fold higher IRD risk (odds ratio [95% confidence interval] of 1.98 [1.39, 2.83] vs ≤ 1) and had good sensitivity (73%) and moderate specificity (42%). Among patients referred through a standard referral pathway (n = 283), RhePort 1.3 scores > 1 in addition to physician referral were associated with increases in rheumatology-diagnosed IRD rates from 33.2% (physician referral only) to 45.7%. RhePort 1.3 had higher accuracy than earlier versions (54% vs 35%). We conclude that modest changes to the RhePort questionnaire resulted in increased accuracy. A score > 1 was associated with a doubled risk for an IRD and higher IRD rates in physician-referred patients. These data suggest that RhePort has the potential to streamline the rheumatologist's workload and improve resource use. Further modifications are required to improve specificity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.