Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40293987›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

The canine vaginal microbiome during heat and fertility in healthy breeding dogs.

Anna Sophia Leps, Eva-Maria Packeiser, Christina Schwens, Benjamin Stoelcker, Semir Doric, Martina Wirkner, Beate Walter, Axel Wehrend, Viktoria Kichmann, Klaus Jung and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Anna Sophia LepsUnit for Reproductive Medicine - Clinic for Small Animals, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, Hannover, Germany.
Eva-Maria PackeiserUnit for Reproductive Medicine - Clinic for Small Animals, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6694-3851
Christina SchwensAntech Lab Germany GmbH, Augsburg, Germany.
Benjamin StoelckerAntech Lab Germany GmbH, Augsburg, Germany.
Semir DoricSYNLAB MVZ Weiden GmbH, Dept. of Molecular Biology, Weiden, Germany.
Martina WirknerSYNLAB MVZ Weiden GmbH, Dept. of Molecular Biology, Weiden, Germany.
Beate WalterClinic of Small Animal Surgery and Reproduction at the Centre for Clinical Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, LMU Munich, Germany.
Axel WehrendVeterinary Clinic for Reproductive Medicine and Neonatology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Justus-Liebig-University, Giessen, Germany.
Viktoria KichmannVeterinary Clinic for Reproductive Medicine and Neonatology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Justus-Liebig-University, Giessen, Germany.
Klaus JungInstitute for Animal Genomics, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, Hannover, Germany.
Sandra Goericke-PeschUnit for Reproductive Medicine - Clinic for Small Animals, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4327-9780

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A healthy and balanced vaginal microbiome is often thought to be an important prerequisite for successful breeding and healthy litters. Previous studies investigating the influence of canine vaginal bacteria on fertility mostly relied on aerobic culturing. In recent years, culture-independent methods, such as next-generation sequencing (NGS), have become popular. With the ability to analyze the microbiome as a whole, research in this field has made notable advances. This is the first study to correlate NGS data of the canine vaginal microbiome in heat with fertility data. Healthy breeding bitches (n=80) presented for routine pre-breeding examination were sampled during early heat and mated after ovulation. A vaginal sample was taken for NGS analysis and microbiological culture. Additionally, a blood sample was collected. Fertility data (mating, pregnancy, delivery, litter size) were assessed. NGS revealed a diverse microbiome in all the samples. Bioinformatics and statistical analysis did not provide evidence of larger differences in the microbiome of those bitches that became pregnant and those that did not.

Indexed as

FertilityHot TemperatureMicrobiotaVaginaAnimalsBacteriaBreedingDogsFemaleHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID40293987
PMCPMC12036845

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.