Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40294264›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2025

Copy-cat evolution: Divergence and convergence within and between cat and dog breeds.

Abby Grace Drake, Liam J Revell, Christian Peter Klingenberg, Jimmy C Lattimer, Nathan C Nelson, Martin J Schmidt, Allison L Zwingenberger, Joshua K Moyer, Jonathan B Losos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Copy-cat evolution: Divergence and convergence within and between cat and dog breeds.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Abby Grace DrakeDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853.
Liam J RevellDepartment of Biology, University of Massachusetts, Boston, MA 02125.
Christian Peter KlingenbergDivision of Evolution, Infection and Genomics, School of Biological Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PT, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-8117-6141
Jimmy C LattimerDepartment of Veterinary Medicine and Surgery, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211.
Nathan C NelsonDepartment of Molecular Biomedical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27607.
Martin J SchmidtClinic for Small Animals, Department of Neurosurgery, Neuroradiology and Clinical Neurology, Justus Liebig University, Giessen 35392, Germany.
Allison L ZwingenbergerDepartment of Surgical and Radiological Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA 95616.
Joshua K MoyerDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520.
Jonathan B LososDepartment of Biology, Washington University, Saint Louis, MO 63130.ORCID 0000-0003-4712-8258

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many domesticated species exhibit remarkable phenotypic diversity. In nature, selection produces not only divergence but also convergence when organisms experience similar selective pressures. Whether artificial selection during domestication also produces convergence has received little attention. Three-dimensional shape analysis of domestic cat and dog skulls demonstrated convergence at multiple levels. Most broadly, cats and dogs have both diversified greatly: equaling or exceeding the morphological disparity among all modern-day species of their respective families. Moreover, as a result of artificial selection, some breeds of these two phenotypically distinct species, evolutionarily separated for 50 My, have converged to such an extreme extent that they are more similar to each other than they are to many members of their own species or their ancestors, a phenomenon never previously observed in domesticated species. Remarkably, this convergence evolved not only between dogs and cats but also multiple times within each taxon.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionAnimalsCatsDogsDomesticationPhenotypePhylogenySelection, GeneticSkullSpecies Specificitycatconvergent evolutiondogdomesticationevolution

Identifiers

PMID40294264
PMCPMC12067280

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.