ArticleEuropean journal of public health2025
Behavioural and metabolic mediators of socioeconomic inequalities in type 2 diabetes: comparing counterfactual and traditional mediation analysis.
Article in European journal of public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The importance of material deprivation in type 2 diabetes incidence: longitudinal analyses in the Maastricht study.BMC public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
There is a well-established social gradient in the occurrence of type 2 diabetes, but the extent to which behavioural or metabolic risk factors explain these inequalities remains unclear. Leveraging data from 7123 adults and over 20 years of follow-up, we used counterfactual mediation analysis to estimate the direct effect of low socioeconomic status (measured as educational attainment and occupational class) on the risk of type 2 diabetes, and the indirect effect through behavioural and metabolic risk factors. Mediators included were smoking, high alcohol consumption, low physical activity, diet low in vegetables or fruits, high body mass index (BMI), high fasting glucose, and hypertension. We compared the results to mediation analysis using the difference and the product of coefficients methods. We found an association between low educational attainment 1.31 (95% CI 1.16, 1.45) and low occupational class 1.24 (95% CI 1.09, 1.38) with future risk of type 2 diabetes. In the counterfactual mediation analysis, behavioural and metabolic risk factors explained 60% (95% CI 41%, 75%) of the effect of low educational attainment and 42% (95% CI 19%, 65%) of the effect of occupational class on the risk of type 2 diabetes. The difference and product of coefficients methods yielded similar results. Well-established behavioural and metabolic mediators explained roughly half of the health inequalities in the incidence of type 2 diabetes. Public health interventions should consider alternative mechanisms to reduce disparities in the incidence of type 2 diabetes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.