SynthesisThe International journal on drug policy2025
Harms associated with injecting in public spaces: a global systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in The International journal on drug policy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Moral foundations and attitudes towards supervised consumption services: a regional moderation study.Harm reduction journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDespite increasing backlash against harm reduction efforts and the need to understand the risk environments encountered by people who inject drugs (PWID), a quantitative systematic review on public injecting and associated health and drug-related outcomes is lacking. We aimed to summarize the global evidence on the prevalence and harms associated with injecting in public spaces.
methodsWe searched MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Scopus, Global Health, and Web of Science from inception to March 21, 2024. We pooled data from included studies using random-effects meta-analyses to quantify the associations between recent (i.e., current or within the last year) public injecting and associated outcomes. Public injecting was defined as injecting in public or semi-public spaces, including streets, parks, and abandoned buildings. Risk of bias was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute's critical appraisal tool.
resultsOf the 6144 initial records, 84 studies were eligible for inclusion. The pooled prevalence of recent public injecting was 48.85 % (95 % confidence intervals [CI] 43.87, 53.85). Public injecting was associated with increased odds of recent non-fatal overdose (odds ratio [OR] 2.51, 95 % CI 2.01, 3.13), HCV infection (OR 1.55, 95 % CI 1.18, 2.02), recent needle/syringe sharing (OR 2.41, 95 % CI 1.97, 2.94), recent sex work (OR 1.75, 95 % CI 1.03, 2.97), recent incarceration (OR 2.10, 95 % CI 1.78, 2.47), and recent unstable housing/homelessness (OR 4.23, 95 % CI 3.17, 5.65). Public injecting showed a statistically non-significant association with HIV infection (OR 1.41, 95 % CI 0.80, 2.46). Public injecting was also associated with a higher willingness to use supervised injection facilities (OR 2.66, 95 % CI 1.86, 3.80).
conclusionPublic injecting is prevalent among PWID and associated with various adverse drug- and health-related outcomes, highlighting the need for increased access to safe injection spaces. Findings support developing interventions to reduce harms from public injecting, such as addressing structural risks from law enforcement, expanding naloxone programs, and establishing overdose prevention centers. Housing interventions, in particular, could serve as an effective upstream strategy to reduce public injecting and related harms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.