ReviewNpj viruses2024
Uncovered diversity of infectious circular RNAs: A new paradigm for the minimal parasites?
Review in Npj viruses, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- A newly established reverse genetic system for a circular RNA virus reveals new requirements for infection and its biocontrol potential.Science advances · 2026Article
- Mycoviruses diversity in the black kōji mold, Aspergillus luchuensis (section Nigri) isolated from liquor-production environments in Japan.Virus research · 2026Article
- Derailing the host machinery to achieve replication: how viroid and viroid-like RNAs successfully copy their genomes in hostile territory.RNA biology · 2025Review
- Article
- Viroids and Retrozymes: Plant Circular RNAs Capable of Autonomous Replication.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Infectious circular RNAs (circRNAs) have been considered as biological oddities only occurring in plants, with limited exceptions. However, a great diversity of viroid-like circRNAs has been recently uncovered by the high-throughput exploration of transcriptomic data of geographically and ecologically diverse niches. In my opinion, this suggests a change in basic assumptions regarding our knowledge about these minimal parasites. The potentially infectious circRNAs found are diverse in size, type of ribozymes, encoded proteins and potential host organisms. The distinction between viroids and RNA viruses has been blurred by the detection of circular mitoviruses and ambiviruses which encode for their own RNA-dependent RNA polymerase. Thus, their taxonomic classification might pose a challenge because of the apparent extensive horizontal transfer and recombination of sequences. Many aspects of the predicted circRNAs remain to be uncovered, such as their pathogenicity or host range, and experimental validations are essential. For example, viroid-like circRNAs similar in size to plant viroids have been found to replicate and cause symptoms in fungi, with an isolate being the smallest replicon characterized so far. Despite an ancestral prebiotic origin for viroid-like sequences has been proposed, their dependence of viral or cellular proteins seems, to my view, more compatible with a cellular escape and/or viral genome reduction. This wide variety of potentially infectious agents might pose a biohazard concern of which we were previously unaware, and thus it would be convenient that more efforts are assigned for their characterization.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.