ArticleBMC cardiovascular disorders2025
Association between soluble suppression of tumorigenicity 2 and risk and severity of coronary artery disease: a case control study.
Article in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The role of soluble suppression of tumorigenicity 2 in pulmonary hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2026Review
- Predictive value of dynamic changes in RvD1, sST2, and PIV levels for the prognosis of STEMI patients after PCI: a prospective study.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Characteristics and risk factors for mortality in patients with acute coronary syndrome concomitant sepsis: a retrospective multicenter cohort study.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTo investigate the differential expression of soluble suppression of tumorigenicity 2 (sST2) in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and healthy controls, and the correlation between sST2 and the severity of coronary artery atherosclerosis.
methodsA total of 911 CAD patients were selected as the CAD group, and 322 healthy people were selected as the control group. We measured serum sST2 level by chemiluminescence immunoassay, and applied the Gensini scoring system to quantify the severity of coronary artery atherosclerosis. We utilized Mann-Whitney U test to assess the difference of sST2 level between the two groups, and adopted Spearman correlation test to evaluate the correlation between sST2 level and Gensini score and inflammatory indexes.
resultsCompared with the control group, the expression level of sST2 in CAD group was significantly increased [29.20 (20.67, 46.34) vs. 19.69 (15.97, 25.02), P < 0.001]. Logistic regression showed that sST2 expression could increase CAD risk (OR = 1.099, 95%CI: 1.080 ~ 1.119, P < 0.001). Analysis of variance revealed that the sST2 expression level increased gradually in unstable angina pectoris group (UA), non-ST elevation myocardial infarction group (NSTEMI) and ST elevation myocardial infarction group (STEMI) [UA: 23.05 (17.54, 30.75), NSTEMI: 30.71 (21.31, 42.97), STEMI: 51.05 (32.85, 80.04), P < 0.001]. Spearman correlation analysis demonstrated significantly positive associations between sST2 expression level and Gensini score (r = 0.137, P < 0.001), and systemic inflammatory indexes MHR (r = 0.188, P < 0.001), NLR (r = 0.469, P < 0.001), PLR (r = 0.285, P < 0.001) and MLR (r = 0.368, P < 0.001), but negatively correlated with AFR (r=-0.135, P < 0.001). By receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, the sST2 expression level had excellent predictive effect in STEMI with the area under the curve (AUC) value of 0.926 (95%CI: 0.903-0.948, P < 0.001) and sensitivity and specificity of 72.3% and 99.7% respectively, superior to NSTEMI with an AUC of 0.760 (95%CI: 0.719-0.802, P < 0.001) and UA with an AUC of 0.616 (95%CI: 0.576-0.656, P < 0.001).
conclusionssST2 could not only serve as a biomarker for the clinical auxiliary diagnosis of CAD, but also act as a potential indicator for disease progression or risk stratification. Dynamic monitoring of sST2 levels might assist in evaluating treatment efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.