ArticleSexual and reproductive health matters2025
The limits of preconception care for global health.
Article in Sexual and reproductive health matters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Primary care providers' perspectives on barriers and enablers influencing preconception care provision for African migrant and refugee women: qualitative interviews.Health promotion international · 2026Article
- Gender norms and responsibility for preconception health improvement: challenges and recommendations for action from the 2024 UK preconception EMCR network conference.Reproductive health · 2026Article
- Perspectives on preconception care in Ethiopia: Social, cultural, and structural determinants.PloS one · 2026Article
- Participants' perceptions of the preconception phase of theWomen's health (London, England)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Global health programmes aimed at reducing maternal and childhood mortality and morbidity are increasingly employing the concept of "preconception care" - an approach that the World Health Organization defines as interventions that occur before women (or couples) conceive and that address factors that could lead to poor birth outcomes. While the goal of improving maternal and child health outcomes is a vital one that is most assuredly shared by all in the global health community, the concept of preconception care is not without its limits and has significant drawbacks. From a gender rights and equity perspective, the preconception care framework has the potential to introduce harms and risks to women and people capable of getting pregnant. In this article, we summarise the key concerns about preconception care for global health in the twenty-first century. We recommend alternative frameworks that do not revolve around conception and have the potential to benefit all, including women, men, people who can get pregnant, people who do not want to get pregnant, pregnant individuals, and children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.