ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2025
Optimization and impact of an evidence-based pre-audit prescription decision system in primary healthcare settings.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative Analysis of Prescriptions and Pharmacy Services in Internet-Based Psychiatric Hospital During and After the COVID-19 Pandemic: Retrospective Cross-Sectional Observational Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Observational
- Construction and refined management of a pre-prescription review system: a real-world study in a tertiary hospital.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Application of pre-prescription review of suspicious data via intelligent supervision platform for secondary prevention of cardiovascular diseases based on evidence-based medicine.Postepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Analyze the operation mode of the prescription pre-audit intelligent decision system in a county-level hospital, evaluate its intervention effects on outpatient and emergency operations, thus providing references for similar hospitals to carry out pre-audit intelligent decision system and promote rational drug use. Methods: Utilizing evidence-based approaches, system rule modifications have been refined and synergized with AI-driven decision-making analytics to examine the operational framework of pre-audit prescription decision system. Additionally, retrospectively analyze the types and levels of problems triggered by outpatient and emergency prescriptions from October 2022 to August 2023, as well as the rationality of prescriptions in the system. Results: According to the clinical operation of the hospital, problems triggered by unreasonable prescriptions have been finely classified into different levels according to the severity of prescription problems. From October 2022 to August 2023, the number of prescriptions triggering issues such as indications, dosage, special populations, compatibility, administration, and contraindications showed a decreasing trend compared with October 2022 before the intervention. For example, the number of prescriptions with unreasonable routes of administration decreased from 1,745 to 20, and the number of contraindicated prescriptions decreased from 1,399 to 16. The prescriptions triggering Level 5 alerts decreased from 5.609% to 1.793% and the prescription compliance rate increased from 92.20% to 95.98%. Conclusion: The prescription pre-audit intelligent decision system enhances patient safety and promotes rational drug use. However, the system requires fine-tuning and continuous improvement of the system rule library to effectively validate prescriptions and improve prescription accuracy. In the future, integrating big data, artificial intelligence and other technologies for secondary system development will be a model worthy of consideration. In addition, promoting this system to medical federation to establish a regional prescription review model will further promote the high-quality development of pharmaceutical services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.