ArticleResearch square2025
Advanced Brain Age Prediction Using Multi-Head Self-Attention: A Comparative Analysis of Western and Middle Eastern MRI Datasets.
Article in Research square, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Brain age estimation is a critical biomarker for early detection of neurodegenerative diseases, but existing models are primarily trained on Western datasets, limiting their applicability to diverse populations. Recent studies suggest that brain aging patterns vary across ethnic groups, highlighting the need for more inclusive and adaptable AI-driven neuroimaging models. We trained our model on 4,635 healthy individuals (40-80 years) from ADNI, OASIS-3, Cam-CAN, and IXI, using 80% of data (n=3700) for training and 20% (n=935) for testing. The model was further tested on a Middle Eastern dataset (107 subjects, Tehran, Iran). It integrates multi-head self-attention along with residual connections to enhance long-range spatial feature learning, improving upon previous CNN models. Performance was evaluated using mean absolute error (MAE). The model achieved state-of-the-art accuracy (MAE = 1.99 years) on the Western test set, while being much lighter than previous models (approximately 3 million parameters); however, it performed significantly worse on the ME dataset (best MAE = 4.35 years, final = 5.83 years). Bias correction did not improve performance, indicating population-specific brain aging differences. These findings emphasize the need for diverse training datasets and cross-population adaptation techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.