ArticleBioinformatics advances2025
Enhanced metabolomic predictions using concept drift analysis: identification and correction of confounding factors.
Article in Bioinformatics advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Motivation: The increasing use of big data and optimized prediction methods in metabolomics requires techniques aligned with biological assumptions to improve early symptom diagnosis. One major challenge in predictive data analysis is handling confounding factors-variables influencing predictions but not directly included in the analysis. Results: Detecting and correcting confounding factors enhances prediction accuracy, reducing false negatives that contribute to diagnostic errors. This study reviews concept drift detection methods in metabolomic predictions and selects the most appropriate ones. We introduce a new implementation of concept drift analysis in predictive classifiers using metabolomics data. Known confounding factors were confirmed, validating our approach and aligning it with conventional methods. Additionally, we identified potential confounding factors that may influence biomarker analysis, which could introduce bias and impact model performance. Availability and implementation: Based on biological assumptions supported by detected concept drift, these confounding factors were incorporated into correction of prediction algorithms to enhance their accuracy. The proposed methodology has been implemented in Semi-Automated Pipeline using Concept Drift Analysis for improving Metabolomic Predictions (SAPCDAMP), an open-source workflow available at https://github.com/JanaSchwarzerova/SAPCDAMP.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.