Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40297776›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics advances2025

Enhanced metabolomic predictions using concept drift analysis: identification and correction of confounding factors.

Jana Schwarzerova, Dominika Olesova, Katerina Jureckova, Ales Kvasnicka, Ales Kostoval, David Friedecky, Jiri Sekora, Jitka Pomenkova, Valentyna Provaznik, Lubos Popelinsky and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jana SchwarzerovaDepartment of Functional and Evolutionary Ecology, Molecular Systems Biology (MOSYS), University of Vienna, Vienna 1010, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2918-9313
Dominika OlesovaInstitute of Experimental Endocrinology, Biomedical Research Center, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava 845 05, Slovak Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6840-5248
Katerina JureckovaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Communication, Brno University of Technology, Brno 616 00, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5143-9521
Ales KvasnickaLaboratory for Inherited Metabolic Disorders, Department of Clinical Biochemistry, University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc 779 00, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5973-316X
Ales KostovalDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Communication, Brno University of Technology, Brno 616 00, Czech Republic.
David FriedeckyLaboratory for Inherited Metabolic Disorders, Department of Clinical Biochemistry, University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc 779 00, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3448-9073
Jiri SekoraDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Communication, Brno University of Technology, Brno 616 00, Czech Republic.
Jitka PomenkovaDepartment of Radio Electronics, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Communication, Brno University of Technology, Brno 616 00, Czech Republic.
Valentyna ProvaznikDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Communication, Brno University of Technology, Brno 616 00, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3422-7938
Lubos PopelinskyFaculty of Informatics, Masaryk University, Brno 602 00, Czech Republic.
Wolfram WeckwerthDepartment of Functional and Evolutionary Ecology, Molecular Systems Biology (MOSYS), University of Vienna, Vienna 1010, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9719-6358

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motivation: The increasing use of big data and optimized prediction methods in metabolomics requires techniques aligned with biological assumptions to improve early symptom diagnosis. One major challenge in predictive data analysis is handling confounding factors-variables influencing predictions but not directly included in the analysis. Results: Detecting and correcting confounding factors enhances prediction accuracy, reducing false negatives that contribute to diagnostic errors. This study reviews concept drift detection methods in metabolomic predictions and selects the most appropriate ones. We introduce a new implementation of concept drift analysis in predictive classifiers using metabolomics data. Known confounding factors were confirmed, validating our approach and aligning it with conventional methods. Additionally, we identified potential confounding factors that may influence biomarker analysis, which could introduce bias and impact model performance. Availability and implementation: Based on biological assumptions supported by detected concept drift, these confounding factors were incorporated into correction of prediction algorithms to enhance their accuracy. The proposed methodology has been implemented in Semi-Automated Pipeline using Concept Drift Analysis for improving Metabolomic Predictions (SAPCDAMP), an open-source workflow available at https://github.com/JanaSchwarzerova/SAPCDAMP.

Identifiers

PMID40297776
PMCPMC12037104

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.