Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40298033›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of pain (London, England)2025

HOPE for Hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome (hEDS) and Hypermobility Spectrum Disorder (HSD)-A Pilot Randomised Controlled Trial of Feasibility, Acceptability and Appropriateness.

Min Tze Chew, Emre Ilhan, Leslie L Nicholson, Sarah Kobayashi, Verity Pacey, Alan Hakim, Cliffton Chan

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of pain (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Min Tze ChewDepartment of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, North Ryde, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3197-1064
Emre IlhanDepartment of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, North Ryde, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4075-0733
Leslie L NicholsonDepartment of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, North Ryde, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9178-2535
Sarah KobayashiFaculty of Medicine and Health, Kolling Institute, University of Sydney, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7816-2198
Verity PaceyDepartment of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, North Ryde, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5577-2732
Alan HakimThe Ehlers-Danlos Society, The Ehlers-Danlos Society - Europe, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7170-1697
Cliffton ChanDepartment of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, North Ryde, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3259-1242

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFeasibility and effectiveness of online pain management programs for chronic widespread pain conditions have been shown; yet, there are no empirically evaluated programs for hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (hEDS) or hypermobility spectrum disorder (HSD). Bridging this gap, the Hypermobile Online Pain managemEnt (HOPE) program was developed with stakeholder input to be pilot tested.

methodsWe conducted a randomised controlled trial of the HOPE program to assess Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM), Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM) and Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM) and eight clinical effectiveness outcomes. Intervention participants were given 8 weeks to complete 12 self-paced modules, while control participants continued treatment as usual. Participants were assessed at baseline, post-treatment and 3 months post-treatment using online surveys.

resultsSeventy-two participants were recruited and randomised. Two control participants withdrew before starting, leaving 34 controls and 36 intervention participants for analysis. In all, 81%-91% agreed/completely agreed that the HOPE program was feasible with mean FIM score of 4.3/5 (SD 0.7), 62%-76% agreed/completely agreed that it was acceptable with mean AIM score of 3.9/5 (SD 0.96) and 67%-76% agreed/completely agreed that it was appropriate with mean IAM score of 4.0/5 (SD 0.9). Only two clinical effectiveness outcomes were significantly improved in the intervention group, with moderate and small effect sizes in worst pain intensity (Cohen's d = 0.63) and impact of hypermobility (Cohen's d = 0.32) at 3 months post-intervention, respectively.

conclusionThe HOPE program seemed feasible, acceptable and appropriate, with preliminary improvements in worst pain intensity and impact of hypermobility. Our findings warrant a fully powered trial to further explore the clinical effectiveness of this online pain intervention. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Pain is of high concern among people with hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (hEDS) or hypermobility spectrum disorder (HSD), yet there are limited online pain management resources for them. This pilot trial of the novel Hypermobile Online Pain managemEnt (HOPE) program is important in guiding the creation of evidence-based and stakeholder-relevant online resources. Promising results suggest the importance of further refinement and retesting its effectiveness before wider implementation among the hEDS/HSD population so as to empower them in pain self-management.

Indexed as

Chronic PainEhlers-Danlos SyndromeJoint InstabilityPain ManagementAdultFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health CarePilot ProjectsTreatment OutcomeYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40298033
PMCPMC12038781

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.