ReviewAmerican journal of reproductive immunology (New York, N.Y. : 1989)2025
Current Evidence of Maternal Infection With Chlamydia trachomatis and Preeclampsia Risk.
Review in American journal of reproductive immunology (New York, N.Y. : 1989), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Immunopathology of Preeclampsia.Biomedicines · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Chlamydia trachomatis is the most common bacterial sexually transmitted infection (STI) in the United States. Ascending C. trachomatis can cause pelvic inflammatory disease (PID), potentially leading to subsequent infertility, ectopic pregnancy, and adverse pregnancy outcomes. There is growing evidence implicating infections (e.g., COVID-19, cytomegalovirus) in preeclampsia etiology, a maternal hypertensive disorder and leading cause of maternal morbidity and mortality. However, few studies have investigated the impact of STIs on preeclampsia risk. In this review, we provide an overview of the potential association between C. trachomatis and preeclampsia and identify future research needs through a critical evaluation of epidemiologic, in vitro, and in vivo studies. Unfortunately, current methodological limitations such as lower-quality study designs, selection bias, confounding bias, and variations in chlamydia diagnostic methods inhibit our understanding of the impact of C. trachomatis on preeclampsia. In addition, bench-side approaches such as animal models and in vitro studies have not elucidated the mechanisms linking C. trachomatis to preeclampsia. Understanding the biological pathways that could be disrupted by chlamydia is important as it may ultimately guide the development and use of novel therapeutics to augment standard antibiotic therapy to reduce pathology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.